Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674143›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Using Metaphors to Understand Suffering in COVID-19 Survivors: A Two Time-Point Observational Follow-Up Study.

Alvisa Palese, Erica Visintini, Valentina Bressan, Federico Fonda, Stefania Chiappinotto, Luca Grassetti, Maddalena Peghin, Carlo Tascini, Matteo Balestrieri, Marco Colizzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alvisa PaleseSchool of Nursing, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3508-844X
Erica VisintiniSchool of Nursing, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Valentina BressanSchool of Nursing, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Federico FondaSchool of Nursing, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-9676
Stefania ChiappinottoSchool of Nursing, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4829-1831
Luca GrassettiDepartment of Economics and Statistics (DIES), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1997-8001
Maddalena PeghinInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria-ASST-Sette Laghi, 33100 Varese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4640-679X
Carlo TasciniInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Matteo BalestrieriUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Marco ColizziUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-1920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic carries risks to psychological health and represents a collective traumatic experience with consequences at the social, economic, and health levels. The primary aim of this study was to collect ongoing COVID-19 survivors’ pandemic-related experiences as expressed through the use of metaphors; the secondary aim was to explore socio-demographic variables associated with the metaphor orientation as negative, positive or neutral. An observational follow-up survey was conducted and reported according to the STROBE guidelines. Patients ≥ 18 years, who were treated for COVID-19 during the first wave (March/April 2020) and who were willing to participate in a telephone interview were involved and asked to summarize their COVID-19 experience as lived up to 6 and 12 months in a metaphor. A total of 339 patients participated in the first (6 months) and second (12 months) data collection. Patients were mainly female (51.9%), with an average age of 52.9 years (confidence interval, CI 95% 51.2−54.6). At 6 months, most participants (214; 63.1%) used a negative-oriented metaphor, further increasing at 12 months (266; 78.5%), when they used fewer neutral-/positive-oriented metaphors (p < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up, only three individual variables (female gender, education, and experiencing symptoms at the COVID-19 onset) were significantly different across the possible metaphor orientation; at 12 months, no individual variables were significantly associated. This study suggests increasingly negative lived experiences over time and the need for personalized healthcare pathways to face the long-term traumatic consequences of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMetaphorMiddle AgedPandemicsSurvivorscoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19follow-uplived experiencelongitudinal studymetaphorsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID36674143
PMCPMC9859410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.