Efficacy and Safety of ab Externo Phaco-Canaloplasty versus First-Generation iStent Bypass Implantation Combined with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma-Early Results.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Performance and Safety of Minimally Invasive Nasal Trabeculostomy (MINT™) in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A 12-month Open-Label Study on Patients with No Other Glaucoma Surgeries.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
   Article
2. First-Generation iStent Bypass Implantation versus ab Externo Canaloplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma-12-Month Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
   Article
3. A Review of Canaloplasty in the Treatment and Management of Glaucoma.Journal of current glaucoma practice
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as