Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674037›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Comparison of the Physical Care Burden on Formal Caregivers between Manual Human Care Using a Paper Diaper and Robot-Aided Care in Excretion Care.

Jeong-Bae Ko, Yong-Ku Kong, Kyeong-Hee Choi, Chang-Ki Lee, Hyun-Ji Keum, Jae-Soo Hong, Byeong-Hee Won

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeong-Bae KoDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9279-2564
Yong-Ku KongDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3208-6817
Kyeong-Hee ChoiDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Ki LeeDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Ji KeumDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Soo HongDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-8647
Byeong-Hee WonDigital Healthcare R&D Department, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Cheonan 31056, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the older population has been rapidly growing, the availability of formal caregivers remains limited. Assistance provided by care robots has helped lower this burden; however, whether using a care robot while providing excretion care (EC) is quantitatively increasing or decreasing caregivers' physical care burden has not been extensively studied. This study aimed to quantitatively compare the physical burden experienced by caregivers while providing manual excretion care (MC) using a paper diaper versus robot-aided care (RC). Ten formal caregivers voluntarily participated in the experiment. MC and RC tasks were structuralized according to phases and classified by characteristics. The experiment was conducted in a smart care space. The physical load of formal caregivers was estimated by muscular activity and subjective rating of perceived physical discomfort. The results demonstrated that although the physical load on the lower back and upper extremities during the preparation and post-care phases were greater in RC than MC, RC markedly alleviated caregivers' physical load when performing front tasks. In the preparation-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities were approximately 40.2 and 39.6% higher in the case of RC than MC, respectively. Similar to the preparation-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities during post-care phases were approximately 39.5 and 61.7% greater in the case of RC than MC, respectively. On the other hand, in the front-care phases, the physical loads on the lower back and upper extremities were approximately 25.6 and 34.9% lower in the case of RC than MC, respectively. These findings can quantitatively explain the effectiveness and features of a care robot to stakeholders and provide foundational research data for the development of EC robots. This study emphasizes the implementation and promotion of the dissemination, popularization, and development of care robots to fulfill formal caregiving needs.

Indexed as

CaregiversRoboticsCaregiver BurdenHumansexcretion careformal caregivermanual human carephysical care burdenrobot-aided care

Identifiers

PMID36674037
PMCPMC9858739
OpenAlexW4315498856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.