Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36674005›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Hands off the Mink! Using Environmental Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in American Mink.

Ellen Boyd, Michelle Coombe, Natalie Prystajecky, Jessica M Caleta, Inna Sekirov, John Tyson, Chelsea Himsworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ellen BoydMinistry of Agriculture and Food, Government of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3, Canada.
Michelle CoombeMinistry of Agriculture and Food, Government of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3, Canada.
Natalie PrystajeckySchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Jessica M CaletaBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Inna SekirovBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
John TysonBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4R4, Canada.
Chelsea HimsworthMinistry of Agriculture and Food, Government of British Columbia, Abbotsford, BC V3G 2M3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8081-9555

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous non-human species were shown to be susceptible to natural infection by SARS-CoV-2, including farmed American mink. Once infected, American mink can transfer the virus from mink to human and mink to mink, resulting in a high rate of viral mutation. Therefore, outbreak surveillance on American mink farms is imperative for both mink and human health. Historically, disease surveillance on mink farms has consisted of a combination of mortality and live animal sampling; however, these methodologies have significant limitations. This study compared PCR testing of both deceased and live animal samples to environmental samples on an active outbreak premise, to determine the utility of environmental sampling. Environmental sampling mirrored trends in both deceased and live animal sampling in terms of percent positivity and appeared more sensitive in some low-prevalence instances. PCR CT values of environmental samples were significantly different from live animal samples' CT values and were consistently high (mean CT = 36.2), likely indicating a low amount of viral RNA in the samples. There is compelling evidence in favour of environmental sampling for the purpose of disease surveillance, specifically as an early warning tool for SARS-CoV-2; however, further work is needed to ultimately determine whether environmental samples are viable sources for molecular epidemiology investigations.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AnimalsHumansMinkPandemicsPolymerase Chain ReactionAmerican minkenvironmental surveillanceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36674005
PMCPMC9858792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.