Nurse, Give Me the News! Understanding Support for and Opposition to a COVID-19 Health Screening System.

Natalia Gulbransen-Diaz, Soojeong Yoo, Audrey P Wang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Designing Digital COVID-19 Screening: Insights and Deliberations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia Gulbransen-DiazSchool of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-1110

Soojeong YooWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London W1W 7TY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-6784

Audrey P WangBiomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-4357

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helping the sick and protecting the vulnerable has long been the credo of the health profession. In response to the coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19 pandemic), hospitals and healthcare institutions have rapidly employed public health measures to mitigate patient and staff infection. This paper investigates staff and visitor responses to the COVID-19 eGate health screening system; a self-service technology (SST) which aims to protect health care workers and facilities from COVID-19. Our study evaluates the in situ deployment of the eGate, and employs a System Usability Scale (SUS) and questionnaire (

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19designdigital healthhealth screeninghealth serviceshospitalimplementationInternet of Medical ThingsInternet of Thingsqualitative studyself-service technology

Identifiers

PMID36673919

DOI10.3390/ijerph20021164

PMCPMC9859575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.