Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673683›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Comparison of the Portuguese Version of the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) with Accelerometry for Classifying Physical Activity among Pregnant Women with Obesity.

Diana Bernardo, Carlos Carvalho, Raquel Leirós-Rodríguez, Jorge Mota, Paula Clara Santos

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana BernardoKinesioLab Research Unit in Human Movement, Department of Physiotherapy, Piaget Institute, School of Health, 4405-678 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Carlos CarvalhoSword Health Technologies, Department of Physiotherapy, 4100-467 Porto, Portugal.
Raquel Leirós-RodríguezSALBIS Research Group, Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, University of Leon, 24004 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7502-7644
Jorge MotaResearch Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (FADEUP), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7571-9181
Paula Clara SantosResearch Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure (CIAFEL), Faculty of Sport, University of Porto (FADEUP), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-700X
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidad de León · ES

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/DES/116586/2010Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UI/BD/151206/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the number of pregnant women with obesity has increased exponentially; thus, it is important to evaluate and characterize the physical activity levels of this specific group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Portuguese version of the Physical Activity and Pregnancy Questionnaire and Pregnancy Questionnaire in pregnant women with obesity and to classify physical activity using the Physical Activity and Pregnancy Questionnaire and accelerometry. An analytical observational study was carried out between May and August of 2019 at the University Hospital Center of São João, with a sample of 31 pregnant women with obesity (30.9 ± 4.6 years 36.5 ± 4.6 kg/m

Indexed as

ExercisePregnant PeopleAccelerometryFemaleHumansObesityPortugalPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesassessmentgynecology and obstetricsmaternalobesityphysical activitypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36673683
PMCPMC9859283
OpenAlexW4313503814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.