Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673641›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

AI-Assisted Assessment of Wound Tissue with Automatic Color and Measurement Calibration on Images Taken with a Smartphone.

Sawrawit Chairat, Sitthichok Chaichulee, Tulaya Dissaneewate, Piyanun Wangkulangkul, Laliphat Kongpanichakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sawrawit ChairatDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4629-3924
Sitthichok ChaichuleeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-7925
Tulaya DissaneewateDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2947-0375
Piyanun WangkulangkulDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0585-3649
Laliphat KongpanichakulDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-6334

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla UniversityGraduate School, Prince of Songkla University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound assessment is essential for evaluating wound healing. One cornerstone of wound care practice is the use of clinical guidelines that mandate regular documentation, including wound size and wound tissue composition, to determine the rate of wound healing. The traditional method requires wound care professionals to manually measure the wound area and tissue composition, which is time-consuming, costly, and difficult to reproduce. In this work, we propose an approach for automatic wound assessment that incorporates automatic color and measurement calibration and artificial intelligence algorithms. Our approach enables the comparison of images taken at different times, even if they were taken under different lighting conditions, distances, lenses, and camera sensors. We designed a calibration chart and developed automatic algorithms for color and measurement calibration. The wound area and wound composition on the images were annotated by three physicians with more than ten years of experience. Deep learning models were then developed to mimic what the physicians did on the images. We examined two network variants, U-Net with EfficientNet and U-Net with MobileNetV2, on wound images with a size of 1024 × 1024 pixels. Our best-performing algorithm achieved a mean intersection over union (IoU) of 0.6964, 0.3957, 0.6421, and 0.1552 for segmenting a wound area, epithelialization area, granulation tissue, and necrotic tissue, respectively. Our approach was able to accurately segment the wound area and granulation tissue but was inconsistent with respect to the epithelialization area and necrotic tissue. The calibration chart, which helps calibrate colors and scales, improved the performance of the algorithm. The approach could provide a thorough assessment of the wound, which could help clinicians tailor treatment to the patient's condition.

Indexed as

chronic woundcolor calibrationdeep learningimage segmentationwound care

Identifiers

PMID36673641
PMCPMC9858639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.