Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673469›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Organic Juice Processing Quality from the Processors' Perspective: A Qualitative Study.

Lisa Marie Borghoff, Carola Strassner, Christian Herzig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lisa Marie BorghoffFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3767-1030
Carola StrassnerDepartment of Food · Nutrition · Facilities, FH Münster University of Applied Sciences, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7962-8690
Christian HerzigFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences and Environmental Management, Justus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-1091

Funding

Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture Federal Office for Agriculture and Food
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic food quality is based on processing. While the EU organic production regulation focuses on agricultural production, private standards provide more detailed information about further processing. For the development of organic processing, practitioner perspectives can provide valuable input. To get insight into practitioner perspectives, we conducted semi-structured expert interviews with nine employees of seven partly organic juice processing companies from Germany and Austria. Interview topics were (i) quality of organic juice processing in general, (ii) assessment of specific processing techniques, (iii) product quality of organic juice and (iv) flow of information between producer and consumer. We conducted a thematic analysis. We found that the experts' understanding of process quality mostly includes more aspects than the EU organic production regulation. It covers the whole food chain plus aspects of social and environmental sustainability. The experts prefer directly bottled juice of local raw materials but chiefly accept juice made from concentrate of exotic raw materials because of environmental concerns. Organic juice is preferred when it is cloudy and natural fluctuations are interpreted as an indicator of natural quality. The experts report that consumer information is challenging because of low food literacy. Raising this might help reduce the number of processed juices on the market.

Indexed as

Austriaexpert interviewsGermanyjuice processingorganic food processingorganic food qualityProOrg

Identifiers

PMID36673469
PMCPMC9857823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.