Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673220›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Testing Nonlinearity with Rényi and Tsallis Mutual Information with an Application in the EKC Hypothesis.

Elif Tuna, Atıf Evren, Erhan Ustaoğlu, Büşra Şahin, Zehra Zeynep Şahinbaşoğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elif TunaDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Literature, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa, Esenler, 34210 Istanbul, Turkey.
Atıf EvrenDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Literature, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa, Esenler, 34210 Istanbul, Turkey.
Erhan UstaoğluDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Management, Marmara University, Göztepe, 34180 Istanbul, Turkey.
Büşra ŞahinDepartment of Computer, Faculty of Engineering, Halic University, Eyupsultan, 34060 Istanbul, Turkey.
Zehra Zeynep ŞahinbaşoğluDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Literature, Yildiz Technical University, Davutpasa, Esenler, 34210 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-6447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of dependence between random variables has always been the subject of many statistical problems for over a century. Yet today, there is a great deal of research on this topic, especially focusing on the analysis of nonlinearity. Shannon mutual information has been considered to be the most comprehensive measure of dependence for evaluating total dependence, and several methods have been suggested for discerning the linear and nonlinear components of dependence between two variables. We, in this study, propose employing the Rényi and Tsallis mutual information measures for measuring total dependence because of their parametric nature. We first use a residual analysis in order to remove linear dependence between the variables, and then we compare the Rényi and Tsallis mutual information measures of the original data with that the lacking linear component to determine the degree of nonlinearity. A comparison against the values of the Shannon mutual information measure is also provided. Finally, we apply our method to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) and demonstrate the validity of the EKC hypothesis for Eastern Asian and Asia-Pacific countries.

Indexed as

EKC hypothesisnonlinearityRényi mutual informationTsallis mutual information

Identifiers

PMID36673220
PMCPMC9857815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.