Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673213›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

CEGH: A Hybrid Model Using CEEMD, Entropy, GRU, and History Attention for Intraday Stock Market Forecasting.

Yijiao Liu, Xinghua Liu, Yuxin Zhang, Shuping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yijiao LiuSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China.
Xinghua LiuSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China.
Yuxin ZhangBusiness School, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Shuping LiSchool of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, China.

Funding

Shandong Province Key Research and Development Program (Soft Science Project) No. 2021RKY03052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraday stock time series are noisier and more complex than other financial time series with longer time horizons, which makes it challenging to predict. We propose a hybrid CEGH model for intraday stock market forecasting. The CEGH model contains four stages. First, we use complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition (CEEMD) to decompose the original intraday stock market data into different intrinsic mode functions (IMFs). Then, we calculate the approximate entropy (ApEn) values and sample entropy (SampEn) values of each IMF to eliminate noise. After that, we group the retained IMFs into four groups and predict the comprehensive signals of those groups using a feedforward neural network (FNN) or gate recurrent unit with history attention (GRU-HA). Finally, we obtain the final prediction results by integrating the prediction results of each group. The experiments were conducted on the U.S. and China stock markets to evaluate the proposed model. The results demonstrate that the CEGH model improved forecasting performance considerably. The creation of a collaboration between CEEMD, entropy-based denoising, and GRU-HA is our major contribution. This hybrid model could improve the signal-to-noise ratio of stock data and extract global dependence more comprehensively in intraday stock market forecasting.

Indexed as

approximate entropyattentioncomplete ensemble empirical mode decompositiongated recurrent unitsample entropystock prediction

Identifiers

PMID36673213
PMCPMC9857506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.