Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673207›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Slope Entropy Normalisation by Means of Analytical and Heuristic Reference Values.

David Cuesta-Frau, Mahdy Kouka, Javier Silvestre-Blanes, Víctor Sempere-Payá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Cuesta-FrauTechnological Institute of Informatics (ITI), Universitat Politècnica de València, Alcoi Campus, 03801 Alcoi, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0076-0515
Mahdy KoukaDepartment of System Informatics and Computers, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Javier Silvestre-BlanesTechnological Institute of Informatics (ITI), Universitat Politècnica de València, Alcoi Campus, 03801 Alcoi, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7091-0040
Víctor Sempere-PayáTechnological Institute of Informatics (ITI), Universitat Politècnica de València, Alcoi Campus, 03801 Alcoi, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9271-2010

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slope Entropy (SlpEn) is a very recently proposed entropy calculation method. It is based on the differences between consecutive values in a time series and two new input thresholds to assign a symbol to each resulting difference interval. As the histogram normalisation value, SlpEn uses the actual number of unique patterns found instead of the theoretically expected value. This maximises the information captured by the method but, as a consequence, SlpEn results do not usually fall within the classical [0,1] interval. Although this interval is not necessary at all for time series classification purposes, it is a convenient and common reference framework when entropy analyses take place. This paper describes a method to keep SlpEn results within this interval, and improves the interpretability and comparability of this measure in a similar way as for other methods. It is based on a max-min normalisation scheme, described in two steps. First, an analytic normalisation is proposed using known but very conservative bounds. Afterwards, these bounds are refined using heuristics about the behaviour of the number of patterns found in deterministic and random time series. The results confirm the suitability of the approach proposed, using a mixture of the two methods.

Indexed as

entropy normalisationmaximum entropyminimum entropyslope entropytime series classification

Identifiers

PMID36673207
PMCPMC9858583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.