Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673107›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Analytical Performances of the Novel i-STAT Alinity Point-of-Care Analyzer.

Romaric Larcher, Maxence Lottelier, Stephanie Badiou, Anne-Marie Dupuy, Anne-Sophie Bargnoux, Jean-Paul Cristol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An RFID-Inspired One-Step Packaged Multimode Bio-Analyzer with Vacuum Microfluidics for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Digest of technical papers. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Romaric LarcherBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, PhyMedExp (Physiology and Experimental Medicine), INSERM (French Institute of Health and Medical Research), CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research), University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-0901
Maxence LottelierBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Stephanie BadiouBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, PhyMedExp (Physiology and Experimental Medicine), INSERM (French Institute of Health and Medical Research), CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research), University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Anne-Marie DupuyBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6538-3944
Anne-Sophie BargnouxBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, PhyMedExp (Physiology and Experimental Medicine), INSERM (French Institute of Health and Medical Research), CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research), University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Jean-Paul CristolBiochemistry and Hormonology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, PhyMedExp (Physiology and Experimental Medicine), INSERM (French Institute of Health and Medical Research), CNRS (French National Centre for Scientific Research), University of Montpellier, 34000 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8563-7278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many Point-of-Care devices have been released over the past decade. However, data regarding their analytical performances in real-world situations remains scarce. Herein, we aimed to assess the analytical performances of the i-STAT Alinity system. We conducted an analytical performances study with the i-STAT Alinity device using cartridges CG4+ (pH, Pco2, Po2, lactate, bicarbonate and base excess); CHEM8+ (Na, K, Cl, ionized Ca, urea, creatinine, glucose, hematocrit and hemoglobin) and PT/INR (prothrombin time and international normalized ratio). We assessed the imprecision and compared the results to those obtained on existing instruments in the central laboratory. We found that the within-lab coefficients of variation (CV) were very low (<2%) or low (2−5%), except for creatinine and PT (CV = 5.2% and CV = 6.3%, respectively). For almost all the parameters, the results were strongly (R2 = 90−95%) or very strongly (R2 > 95%) correlated with those of the existing laboratory instruments, and the biases were very low (<2%) or low (2−5%). However, correlations of the PT and INR measurements with existing instruments were lower (R2 = 86.0% and 89.7%), and biases in the Po2 (7.9%), creatinine (5.4%) and PT (−6.6%) measurements were higher. The i-STAT Alinity appeared as a convenient device for measurements of numerous parameters. However, clinicians should interpret Po2, creatinine and PT results with caution.

Indexed as

analytical performanceblood gaschemistrycoagulationcreatininehematologyi-STAT AlinitylactatePoint-of-Care Analyzerurea

Identifiers

PMID36673107
PMCPMC9857650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.