Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673026›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Muscle Cross-Sectional Area Segmentation in Transverse Ultrasound Images Using Vision Transformers.

Sofoklis Katakis, Nikolaos Barotsis, Alexandros Kakotaritis, Panagiotis Tsiganos, George Economou, Elias Panagiotopoulos, George Panayiotakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Physical Rehabilitation of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultrasound Image Analysis with Vision Transformers-Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofoklis KatakisElectronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Nikolaos BarotsisDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Alexandros KakotaritisElectronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Panagiotis TsiganosClinical Radiology Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-4947
George EconomouElectronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Elias PanagiotopoulosOrthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department, Patras University Hospital, 26504 Patras, Greece.
George PanayiotakisDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
University of Patras · GRGeneral University Hospital of Patras · GR

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation MIS-5000432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automatically measuring a muscle’s cross-sectional area is an important application in clinical practice that has been studied extensively in recent years for its ability to assess muscle architecture. Additionally, an adequately segmented cross-sectional area can be used to estimate the echogenicity of the muscle, another valuable parameter correlated with muscle quality. This study assesses state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks and vision transformers for automating this task in a new, large, and diverse database. This database consists of 2005 transverse ultrasound images from four informative muscles for neuromuscular disorders, recorded from 210 subjects of different ages, pathological conditions, and sexes. Regarding the reported results, all of the evaluated deep learning models have achieved near-to-human-level performance. In particular, the manual vs. the automatic measurements of the cross-sectional area exhibit an average discrepancy of less than 38.15 mm2, a significant result demonstrating the feasibility of automating this task. Moreover, the difference in muscle echogenicity estimated from these two readings is only 0.88, another indicator of the proposed method’s success. Furthermore, Bland−Altman analysis of the measurements exhibits no systematic errors since most differences fall between the 95% limits of agreements and the two readings have a 0.97 Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p < 0.001, validation set) with ICC (2, 1) surpassing 0.97, showing the reliability of this approach. Finally, as a supplementary analysis, the texture of the muscle’s visible cross-sectional area was examined using deep learning to investigate whether a classification between healthy subjects and patients with pathological conditions solely from the muscle texture is possible. Our preliminary results indicate that such a task is feasible, but further and more extensive studies are required for more conclusive results.

Indexed as

cross-sectional areadeep learningtextural analysisultrasoundvision transformers

Identifiers

PMID36673026
PMCPMC9858099
OpenAlexW4313826516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.