ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Muscle Cross-Sectional Area Segmentation in Transverse Ultrasound Images Using Vision Transformers.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation of AI-assisted muscle ultrasound for monitoring muscle wasting in ICU patients.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Vision transformer-based ordinal model for semi-quantitative synovitis grading on musculoskeletal ultrasound: a retrospective study with internal and external validation.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Emergent technologies in clinical neurophysiology to study the neuromuscular system: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Physical Rehabilitation of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence powered software for automated analysis of skeletal muscle ultrasonography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Method of Forearm Muscles 3D Modeling Using Robotic Ultrasound Scanning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rectus Femoris Muscle Segmentation on Ultrasound Images of Older Adults Using Automatic Segment Anything Model, nnU-Net and U-Net-A Prospective Study of Hong Kong Community Cohort.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Contraction assessment of abdominal muscles using automated segmentation designed for wearable ultrasound applications.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Ultrasound Image Analysis with Vision Transformers-Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Neuromuscular Ultrasound in Intensive Care Unit-Acquired Weakness: Current State and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound: narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Automatically measuring a muscle’s cross-sectional area is an important application in clinical practice that has been studied extensively in recent years for its ability to assess muscle architecture. Additionally, an adequately segmented cross-sectional area can be used to estimate the echogenicity of the muscle, another valuable parameter correlated with muscle quality. This study assesses state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks and vision transformers for automating this task in a new, large, and diverse database. This database consists of 2005 transverse ultrasound images from four informative muscles for neuromuscular disorders, recorded from 210 subjects of different ages, pathological conditions, and sexes. Regarding the reported results, all of the evaluated deep learning models have achieved near-to-human-level performance. In particular, the manual vs. the automatic measurements of the cross-sectional area exhibit an average discrepancy of less than 38.15 mm2, a significant result demonstrating the feasibility of automating this task. Moreover, the difference in muscle echogenicity estimated from these two readings is only 0.88, another indicator of the proposed method’s success. Furthermore, Bland−Altman analysis of the measurements exhibits no systematic errors since most differences fall between the 95% limits of agreements and the two readings have a 0.97 Pearson’s correlation coefficient (p < 0.001, validation set) with ICC (2, 1) surpassing 0.97, showing the reliability of this approach. Finally, as a supplementary analysis, the texture of the muscle’s visible cross-sectional area was examined using deep learning to investigate whether a classification between healthy subjects and patients with pathological conditions solely from the muscle texture is possible. Our preliminary results indicate that such a task is feasible, but further and more extensive studies are required for more conclusive results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.