Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36673023›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Current Status of the Diagnosis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Kazunori Nakaoka, Eizaburo Ohno, Naoto Kawabe, Teiji Kuzuya, Kohei Funasaka, Yoshihito Nakagawa, Mitsuo Nagasaka, Takuya Ishikawa, Ayako Watanabe, Takumi Tochio and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas: can CT and MR features predict survival?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kazunori NakaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7407-1763
Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.
Naoto KawabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.
Teiji KuzuyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2229-990X
Kohei FunasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-1420
Yoshihito NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.
Mitsuo NagasakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.
Takuya IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 464-0813, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5814-3555
Ayako WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7676-7476
Takumi TochioDepartment of Medical Research on Prebiotics and Probiotics, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1101, Aichi, Japan.
Ryoji MiyaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7172-4602
Tomoyuki ShibataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 464-0813, Aichi, Japan.
Senju HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-2004
Yoshiki HirookaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Aichi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9639-7425
Fujita Health University · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Despite medical progress in each field in recent years, it is still insufficient for managing PDAC, and at present, the only curative treatment is surgery. A typical pancreatic cancer is relatively easy to diagnose with imaging. However, it is often not recommended for surgical treatment at the time of diagnosis due to metastatic spread beyond the pancreas. Even if it is operable, it often recurs during postoperative follow-up. In the case of PDAC with a diameter of 10 mm or less, the 5-year survival rate is as good as 80% or more, and the best index for curative treatment is tumor size. The early detection of pancreatic cancer with a diameter of less than 10 mm or carcinoma in situ is critical. Here, we provide an overview of the current status of diagnostic imaging features and genetic tests for the accurate diagnosis of early-stage PDAC.

Indexed as

computed tomographyearly-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyendoscopic ultrasoundliquid biopsymagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographytransabdominal ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36673023
PMCPMC9857526
OpenAlexW4313646721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.