ArticleGenes2022
Improved Outcomes in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome and Diagnosis of Interrupted Aortic Arch Prior to Birth Hospital Discharge, a Retrospective Study.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prenatal cardiac findings and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Fetal detection and evaluation.Prenatal diagnosis · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Interruption of the aortic arch (IAA) is a rare but life-threatening congenital heart defect if not corrected in the neonatal period. IAA type B is highly correlated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS); approximately 50% of patients with IAA type B also have 22q11.2DS (Peyvandi et al.; Goldmuntz et al.). Early identification and repair of IAA can prevent severe morbidity and death. However, IAA is challenging to identify prenatally, or even in the neonatal period. In this study, we examined infants with IAA, diagnosed during pregnancy and prior to discharge (PPTD) from the birth hospital vs. those diagnosed following discharge (FD) from the newborn nursery. Our goals were to determine: (1) if early diagnosis improved outcomes; and (2) if patients with IAA and without 22q11.2DS had similar outcomes. In total, 135 patients with a diagnosis of 22q11.2DS and IAA were ascertained through the 22q and You Center at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP). The examined outcomes included: timing of diagnosis; age at diagnosis (days); hospital length of stay (LOS); duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay; mechanical ventilation (days); duration of inotrope administration (days); year of surgical intervention; birth hospital trauma level; and overall morbidity. These outcomes were then compared with 40 CHOP patients with IAA but without 22q11.2DS. The results revealed that the PPTD neonates had fewer days of intubation, inotrope administration, and hospital LOS when compared to the FD group. The outcomes between deleted and non-deleted individuals with IAA differed significantly, in terms of the LOS (40 vs. 39 days) and time in ICU (28 vs. 24 days), respectively. These results support the early detection of 22q11.2DS via prenatal screening/diagnostics/newborn screening, as IAA can evade routine prenatal ultrasound and postnatal pulse oximetry. However, as previously reported in patients with 22q11.2DS and congenital heart disease (CHD), patients with 22q11.2DS tend to fare poorer compared to non-deleted neonates with IAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.