Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672771›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Approach to Cohort-Wide Re-Analysis of Exome Data in 1000 Individuals with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

Insa Halfmeyer, Tobias Bartolomaeus, Bernt Popp, Maximilian Radtke, Tobias Helms, Julia Hentschel, Denny Popp, Rami Abou Jamra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Arriving at a diagnosis: Effective strategies used by the Undiagnosed Diseases Network.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  4. De NovoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Insa HalfmeyerInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Tobias BartolomaeusInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Bernt PoppInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3679-1081
Maximilian RadtkeInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Tobias HelmsLimbus Medical Technologies GmbH, Neuer Markt 9/10, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Julia HentschelInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Denny PoppInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5656-2027
Rami Abou JamraInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The re-analysis of nondiagnostic exome sequencing (ES) has the potential to increase diagnostic yields in individuals with rare diseases, but its implementation in the daily routines of laboratories is limited due to restricted capacities. Here, we describe a systematic approach to re-analyse the ES data of a cohort consisting of 1040 diagnostic and nondiagnostic samples. We applied a strict filter cascade to reveal the most promising single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) of the whole cohort, which led to an average of 0.77 variants per individual that had to be manually evaluated. This variant set revealed seven novel diagnoses (0.8% of all nondiagnostic cases) and two secondary findings. Thirteen additional variants were identified by a scientific approach prior to this re-analysis and were also present in this variant set. This resulted in a total increase in the diagnostic yield of 2.3%. The filter cascade was optimised during the course of the study and finally resulted in sensitivity of 85%. After applying the filter cascade, our re-analysis took 20 h and enabled a workflow that can be used repeatedly. This work is intended to provide a practical recommendation for other laboratories wishing to introduce a resource-efficient re-analysis strategy into their clinical routine.

Indexed as

ExomeNeurodevelopmental DisordersCohort StudiesExome SequencingHumansRare Diseasesexome sequencingneurodevelopmental disorderre-analysis

Identifiers

PMID36672771
PMCPMC9858523
OpenAlexW4312117162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.