Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672715›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Clinical and Personal Predictors of Helmet-CPAP Use and Failure in Patients Firstly Admitted to Regular Medical Wards with COVID-19-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (hCPAP-f Study).

Francesco Cei, Ludia Chiarugi, Simona Brancati, Silvia Dolenti, Maria Silvia Montini, Matteo Rosselli, Mario Filippelli, Chiara Ciacci, Irene Sellerio, Marco Maria Gucci and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CPAP delivered via a helmet interface in lightly sedated patients with moderate to severe ARDS: predictors of success outside the ICU.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco CeiDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6905-3467
Ludia ChiarugiDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Simona BrancatiDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Silvia DolentiDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Maria Silvia MontiniDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Matteo RosselliDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Mario FilippelliDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Chiara CiacciDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Irene SellerioDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Marco Maria GucciDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Giulia VanniniDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Rinaldo LavecchiaDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Loredana StaglianòDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Daniele di StefanoDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Tiziana GurreraDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Mario RomagnoliDivision of Internal Medicine II, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Valentina FrancoliniDivision of Internal Medicine II, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Francesca DainelliDivision of Internal Medicine II, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Grazia PanigadaDivision of Internal Medicine, SS Cosma and Damiano Hospital, 51017 Pescia, Italy.
Giancarlo LandiniDivision of Internal Medicine, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, 50100 Firenze, Italy.
Gianluigi MazzoccoliDivision of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3535-7635
Roberto TarquiniDivision of Internal Medicine I, San Giuseppe Hospital, 50053 Empoli, Italy.
Ospedale San Giuseppe · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITSanta Maria Nuova Hospital · IT

Funding

Ministry of Health Italy RC2022-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19 is substantially different from ARDS caused by other diseases and its treatment is dissimilar and challenging. As many studies showed conflicting results regarding the use of Non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19-associated ARDS, no unquestionable indications by operational guidelines were reported. The aim of this study was to estimate the use and success rate of Helmet (h) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in COVID-19-associated ARDS in medical regular wards patients and describe the predictive risk factors for its use and failure. In our monocentric retrospective observational study, we included patients admitted for COVID-19 in medical regular wards. hCPAP was delivered when supplemental conventional or high-flow nasal oxygen failed to achieve respiratory targets. The primary outcomes were hCPAP use and failure rate (including the need to use Bilevel (BL) PAP or oro-tracheal intubation (OTI) and death during ventilation). The secondary outcome was the rate of in-hospital death and OTI. We computed a score derived from the factors independently associated with hCPAP failure. Out of 701 patients admitted with COVID-19 symptoms, 295 were diagnosed with ARDS caused by COVID-19 and treated with hCPAP. Factors associated with the need for hCPAP use were the PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 270, IL-6 serum levels over 46 pg/mL, AST > 33 U/L, and LDH > 570 U/L; age > 78 years and neuropsychiatric conditions were associated with lower use of hCPAP. Failure of hCPAP occurred in 125 patients and was associated with male sex, polypharmacotherapy (at least three medications), platelet count < 180 × 109/L, and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 240. The computed hCPAP-f Score, ranging from 0 to 11.5 points, had an AUC of 0.74 in predicting hCPAP failure (significantly superior to Call Score), and 0.73 for the secondary outcome (non-inferior to IL-6 serum levels). In conclusion, hCPAP was widely used in patients with COVID-19 symptoms admitted to medical regular wards and developing ARDS, with a low OTI rate. A score computed combining male sex, multi-pharmacotherapy, low platelet count, and low PaO2/FiO2 was able to predict hCPAP failure in hospitalized patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19.

Indexed as

ARDSCOVID-19hCPAPnon-invasive ventilationprognosisSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36672715
PMCPMC9856077
OpenAlexW4316465502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.