Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672661›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

Current Evidence on Vasa Previa without Velamentous Cord Insertion or Placental Morphological Anomalies (Type III Vasa Previa): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yuki Takemoto, Shinya Matsuzaki, Satoko Matsuzaki, Mamoru Kakuda, Misooja Lee, Harue Hayashida, Michihide Maeda, Shoji Kamiura

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki TakemotoDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Shinya MatsuzakiDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5725-9994
Satoko MatsuzakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka 558-8558, Japan.
Mamoru KakudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Misooja LeeDepartment of Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka 589-8511, Japan.
Harue HayashidaDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Michihide MaedaDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.
Shoji KamiuraDepartment of Gynecology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-8891
Osaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vasa previa carries a high risk of severe fetal morbidity and mortality due to fetal hemorrhage caused by damage to unprotected fetal cord vessels upon membrane rupture. Vasa previa is generally classified into types I and II. However, some cases are difficult to classify, and some studies have proposed a type III classification. This study aimed to review the current evidence on type III vasa previa. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 11 articles (2011-2022) were included. A systematic review showed that type III vasa previa accounts for 5.7% of vasa previa cases. Thirteen women with type III vasa previa were examined at a patient-level analysis. The median age was 35 (interquartile range [IQR] 31.5-38) years, and approximately 45% were assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancies. The median gestational week of delivery was 36 (IQR 34-37) weeks; the antenatal detection rate was 84.6%, and no cases reported neonatal death. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of ART, antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between types I and III vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The current evidence on type III vasa previa is scanty, and further studies are warranted.

Indexed as

accessory lobesassisted reproductive techniquebilobed placentasuccenturiate lobestype III vasa previavasa previavelamentous cord insertion

Identifiers

PMID36672661
PMCPMC9856204
OpenAlexW4313825792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.