Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672641›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2023

Automated Detection of Broncho-Arterial Pairs Using CT Scans Employing Different Approaches to Classify Lung Diseases.

Sami Azam, A K M Rakibul Haque Rafid, Sidratul Montaha, Asif Karim, Mirjam Jonkman, Friso De Boer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sami AzamFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0909, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-9750
A K M Rakibul Haque RafidHealth Informatics Research Laboratory (HIRL), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-6236-2352
Sidratul MontahaHealth Informatics Research Laboratory (HIRL), Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-3793
Asif KarimFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0909, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8532-6816
Mirjam JonkmanFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0909, Australia.
Friso De BoerFaculty of Science and Technology, Charles Darwin University, Darwin 0909, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUDaffodil International University · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research indicates that for the identification of lung disorders, comprising pneumonia and COVID-19, structural distortions of bronchi and arteries (BA) should be taken into account. CT scans are an effective modality to detect lung anomalies. However, anomalies in bronchi and arteries can be difficult to detect. Therefore, in this study, alterations of bronchi and arteries are considered in the classification of lung diseases. Four approaches to highlight these are introduced: (a) a Hessian-based approach, (b) a region-growing algorithm, (c) a clustering-based approach, and (d) a color-coding-based approach. Prior to this, the lungs are segmented, employing several image preprocessing algorithms. The utilized COVID-19 Lung CT scan dataset contains three classes named Non-COVID, COVID, and community-acquired pneumonia, having 6983, 7593, and 2618 samples, respectively. To classify the CT scans into three classes, two deep learning architectures, (a) a convolutional neural network (CNN) and (b) a CNN with long short-term memory (LSTM) and an attention mechanism, are considered. Both these models are trained with the four datasets achieved from the four approaches. Results show that the CNN model achieved test accuracies of 88.52%, 87.14%, 92.36%, and 95.84% for the Hessian, the region-growing, the color-coding, and the clustering-based approaches, respectively. The CNN with LSTM and an attention mechanism model results in an increase in overall accuracy for all approaches with an 89.61%, 88.28%, 94.61%, and 97.12% test accuracy for the Hessian, region-growing, color-coding, and clustering-based approaches, respectively. To assess overfitting, the accuracy and loss curves and k-fold cross-validation technique are employed. The Hessian-based and region-growing algorithm-based approaches produced nearly equivalent outcomes. Our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art studies, indicating that it may be worthwhile to pay more attention to BA features in lung disease classification based on CT images.

Indexed as

attention mechanismchest CT scanCNNCOVID-19image preprocessingLSTMlung segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36672641
PMCPMC9855445
OpenAlexW4313574419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.