Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672452›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Prognostication in Advanced Cancer by Combining Actigraphy-Derived Rest-Activity and Sleep Parameters with Routine Clinical Data: An Exploratory Machine Learning Study.

Shuchita Dhwiren Patel, Andrew Davies, Emma Laing, Huihai Wu, Jeewaka Mendis, Derk-Jan Dijk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The clinical relevance of sleep disturbance ("insomnia") in patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuchita Dhwiren PatelDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5281-7897
Andrew DaviesTrinity College Dublin, University College Dublin and Our Lady's Hospice, DRW RY72 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4207-4799
Emma LaingSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, UK.
Huihai WuSchool of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, UK.
Jeewaka MendisSurrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, UK.
Derk-Jan DijkSurrey Sleep Research Centre, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5314-1008
University of Surrey · GBUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Palliative Care Research Fund (Prof Davies - Royal Surrey County Hospital), including an unrestricted donation from the family of Mr John Spencer n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival prediction is integral to oncology and palliative care, yet robust prognostic models remain elusive. We assessed the feasibility of combining actigraphy, sleep diary data, and routine clinical parameters to prognosticate. Fifty adult outpatients with advanced cancer and estimated prognosis of <1 year were recruited. Patients were required to wear an Actiwatch® (wrist actigraph) for 8 days, and complete a sleep diary. Univariate and regularised multivariate regression methods were used to identify predictors from 66 variables and construct predictive models of survival. A total of 49 patients completed the study, and 34 patients died within 1 year. Forty-two patients had disrupted rest-activity rhythms (dichotomy index (I < O ≤ 97.5%) but I < O did not have prognostic value in univariate analyses. The Lasso regularised derived algorithm was optimal and able to differentiate participants with shorter/longer survival (log rank p < 0.0001). Predictors associated with increased survival time were: time of awakening sleep efficiency, subjective sleep quality, clinician’s estimate of survival and global health status score, and haemoglobin. A shorter survival time was associated with self-reported sleep disturbance, neutrophil count, serum urea, creatinine, and C-reactive protein. Applying machine learning to actigraphy and sleep data combined with routine clinical data is a promising approach for the development of prognostic tools.

Indexed as

biomarkerscircadianmachine learningpalliative careprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID36672452
PMCPMC9856985
OpenAlexW4316467853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.