Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672354›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Prediction of Primary Tumour and Axillary Lymph Node Response to Neoadjuvant Chemo(Targeted) Therapy with Dedicated Breast [18F]FDG PET/MRI in Breast Cancer.

Cornelis M de Mooij, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten, Briete Goorts, Loes F S Kooreman, Isabel W M Raymakers, Silke P L van Meijl, Maaike de Boer, Kristien B M I Keymeulen, Joachim E Wildberger, Felix M Mottaghy and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The role ofRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. [Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cancers · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparison of MRI vs. [Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Cornelis M de MooijDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7905-6768
Thiemo J A van NijnattenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6431-3538
Briete GoortsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Loes F S KooremanGROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8226-8665
Isabel W M RaymakersDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Silke P L van MeijlDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maaike de BoerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kristien B M I KeymeulenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joachim E WildbergerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7212-6521
Marc B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein L SmidtDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate whether sequential hybrid [18F]FDG PET/MRI can predict the final pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemo(targeted) therapy (NCT) in breast cancer.

methodsSequential [18F]FDG PET/MRI was performed before, halfway through and after NCT, followed by surgery. Qualitative response evaluation was assessed after NCT. Quantitatively, the SUV

resultsForty-one breast cancer patients with forty-two primary tumours and twenty-six cases of pathologically proven cN+ disease were prospectively included. Pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumour occurred in 16 patients and pCR of the ALNMs in 14 cN+ patients. The AUC of the qualitative evaluation after NCT was 0.71 for primary tumours and 0.54 for ALNM responses. For primary tumour response, combining the percentage decrease in SUV

conclusionsQualitative PET/MRI after NCT can predict the final pathologic primary tumour response, but not the ALNM response. Combining quantitative variables halfway through NCT can improve the diagnostic accuracy for final pathologic ALNM response prediction.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsfluorodeoxyglucose F18magnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant therapypositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID36672354
PMCPMC9857040
OpenAlexW4313890708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.