ArticleCancers2023
The Development of an Intelligent Agent to Detect and Non-Invasively Characterize Lung Lesions on CT Scans: Ready for the "Real World"?
Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in Lung Nodules on Chest CT: Retrospective, Real-World Assessment of AI in Clinical Practice.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Challenging the significance of SUV-based parameters in a large-scale retrospective study on lung lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Once lung lesions are identified on CT scans, they must be characterized by assessing the risk of malignancy. Despite the promising performance of computer-aided systems, some limitations related to the study design and technical issues undermine these tools' efficiency; an "intelligent agent" to detect and non-invasively characterize lung lesions on CT scans is proposed. (2) Methods: Two main modules tackled the detection of lung nodules on CT scans and the diagnosis of each nodule into benign and malignant categories. Computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer aided-diagnosis (CADx) modules relied on deep learning techniques such as Retina U-Net and the convolutional neural network; (3) Results: Tests were conducted on one publicly available dataset and two local datasets featuring CT scans acquired with different devices to reveal deep learning performances in "real-world" clinical scenarios. The CADe module reached an accuracy rate of 78%, while the CADx's accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity stand at 80%, 73%, and 85.7%, respectively; (4) Conclusions: Two different deep learning techniques have been adapted for CADe and CADx purposes in both publicly available and private CT scan datasets. Experiments have shown adequate performance in both detection and diagnosis tasks. Nevertheless, some drawbacks still characterize the supervised learning paradigm employed in networks such as CNN and Retina U-Net in real-world clinical scenarios, with CT scans from different devices with different sensors' fingerprints and spatial resolution. Continuous reassessment of CADe and CADx's performance is needed during their implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.