Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672075›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Prediction of Mortality in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.

Ruoran Wang, Xihang Zeng, Yujuan Long, Jing Zhang, Hong Bo, Min He, Jianguo Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruoran WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
Xihang ZengDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
Yujuan LongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Chengdu Seventh People's Hospital, 610021 Chengdu, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
Hong BoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
Min HeDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
Jianguo XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, China.
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CNSeventh People's Hospital of Shanghai · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Sciences JH2022007Department of Sichuan Science and Technology 2021YFS0184, 2021YFS0082National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173175Sichuan University 2021SCU12027West China Hospital of Sichuan University 2020HXFH036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The number of geriatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is increasing every year due to the population’s aging in most of the developed countries. Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized tool for specifically evaluating the prognosis of geriatric TBI patients. We designed this study to compare the prognostic value of different machine learning algorithm-based predictive models for geriatric TBI. Methods: TBI patients aged ≥65 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were eligible for this study. To develop and validate machine learning algorithm-based prognostic models, included patients were divided into a training set and a testing set, with a ratio of 7:3. The predictive value of different machine learning based models was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F score. Results: A total of 1123 geriatric TBI patients were included, with a mortality of 24.8%. Non-survivors had higher age (82.2 vs. 80.7, p = 0.010) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (14 vs. 7, p < 0.001) than survivors. The rate of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher (67.6% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001) in non-survivors while the rate of neurosurgical operation did not differ between survivors and non-survivors (24.3% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.735). Among different machine learning algorithms, Adaboost (AUC: 0.799) and Random Forest (AUC: 0.795) performed slightly better than the logistic regression (AUC: 0.792) on predicting mortality in geriatric TBI patients in the testing set. Conclusion: Adaboost, Random Forest and logistic regression all performed well in predicting mortality of geriatric TBI patients. Prognostication tools utilizing these algorithms are helpful for physicians to evaluate the risk of poor outcomes in geriatric TBI patients and adopt personalized therapeutic options for them.

Indexed as

geriatricmachine learningpredictionprognosistraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36672075
PMCPMC9857144
OpenAlexW4313585362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.