Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672054›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Subthreshold Oscillating Waves in Neural Tissue Propagate by Volume Conduction and Generate Interference.

Chia-Chu Chiang, Dominique M Durand

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chia-Chu ChiangNeural Engineering Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-2300
Dominique M DurandNeural Engineering Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Detection and Control of EpilepsyR01NS060757 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DURAND, DOMINIQUE M · 2008 to 2016
$2.8M
Seizure control by electric field controlR01NS121084 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DURAND, DOMINIQUE M · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Cellular and Neural Network Mechanism of Transcranial Electric StimulationR01NS124592 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DURAND, DOMINIQUE M · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Analysis &Control of NonSynaptic Epileptiform ActivityR01NS040785 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DURAND, DOMINIQUE M · 2001 to 2004
$913k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040785NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060757NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121084NINDS NIH HHS R01NS121084NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124592NINDS NIH HHS R01NS124592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subthreshold neural oscillations have been observed in several brain regions and can influence the timing of neural spikes. However, the spatial extent and function of these spontaneous oscillations remain unclear. To study the mechanisms underlying these oscillations, we use optogenetic stimulation to generate oscillating waves in the longitudinal hippocampal slice expressing optopatch proteins. We found that optogenetic stimulation can generate two types of neural activity: suprathreshold neural spikes and subthreshold oscillating waves. Both waves could propagate bidirectionally at similar speeds and go through a transection of the tissue. The propagating speed is independent of the oscillating frequency but increases with increasing amplitudes of the waves. The endogenous electric fields generated by oscillating waves are about 0.6 mV/mm along the dendrites and about 0.3 mV/mm along the cell layer. We also observed that these oscillating waves could interfere with each other. Optical stimulation applied simultaneously at each slice end generated a larger wave in the middle of the tissue (constructive interference) or destructive interference with laser signals in opposite phase. However, the suprathreshold neural spikes were annihilated when they collided. Finally, the waves were not affected by the NMDA blocker (APV) and still propagated in the presence of tetrodotoxin (TTX) but at a significantly lower amplitude. The role of these subthreshold waves in neural function is unknown, but the results show that at low amplitude, the subthreshold propagating waves lack a refractory period allowing a novel analog form of preprocessing of neural activity by interference independent of synaptic transmission.

Indexed as

hippocampusneural oscillationoptogeneticspropagationsubthreshold oscillation

Identifiers

PMID36672054
PMCPMC9856930
OpenAlexW4313362429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.