Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36672031›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Lactate-Mediated Signaling in the Brain-An Update.

Barbara Vaccari-Cardoso, Maria Antipina, Anja G Teschemacher, Sergey Kasparov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara Vaccari-CardosoSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Maria AntipinaMEDBIO, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Universitetskaya Str., 2, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Anja G TeschemacherSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
Sergey KasparovSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK.
University of Bristol · GBImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal University · RU

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/8/33540British Heart Foundation RG/19/5/34463Russian Federal Academic Leadership Program Priority 2030 at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactate is a universal metabolite produced and released by all cells in the body. Traditionally it was viewed as energy currency that is generated from pyruvate at the end of the glycolytic pathway and sent into the extracellular space for other cells to take up and consume. In the brain, such a mechanism was postulated to operate between astrocytes and neurons many years ago. Later, the discovery of lactate receptors opened yet another chapter in the quest to understand lactate actions. Other ideas, such as modulation of NMDA receptors were also proposed. Up to this day, we still do not have a consensus view on the relevance of any of these mechanisms to brain functions or their contribution to human or animal physiology. While the field develops new ideas, in this brief review we analyze some recently published studies in order to focus on some unresolved controversies and highlight the limitations that need to be addressed in future work. Clearly, only by using similar and overlapping methods, cross-referencing experiments, and perhaps collaborative efforts, we can finally understand what the role of lactate in the brain is and why this ubiquitous molecule is so important.

Indexed as

astrocytelactatemetabolismreceptorsignaling

Identifiers

PMID36672031
PMCPMC9856103
OpenAlexW4313245328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.