Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671977›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2023

Review of Bacterial Nanocellulose-Based Electrochemical Biosensors: Functionalization, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.

Samuel Chagas de Assis, Daniella Lury Morgado, Desiree Tamara Scheidt, Samara Silva de Souza, Marco Roberto Cavallari, Oswaldo Hideo Ando Junior, Emanuel Carrilho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cellulose-Based Electrochemical Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Production of Bacterial Exopolysaccharides: Xanthan and Bacterial Cellulose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel Chagas de AssisGrupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Sustentabilidade Energética-GPEnSE, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana-UNILA, Av. Sílvio Américo Sasdelli, 1842, Foz do Iguaçu 85866-000, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0809-0250
Daniella Lury MorgadoGrupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Sustentabilidade Energética-GPEnSE, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana-UNILA, Av. Sílvio Américo Sasdelli, 1842, Foz do Iguaçu 85866-000, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4018-0822
Desiree Tamara ScheidtInstituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil.
Samara Silva de SouzaGrupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Sustentabilidade Energética-GPEnSE, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana-UNILA, Av. Sílvio Américo Sasdelli, 1842, Foz do Iguaçu 85866-000, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-940X
Marco Roberto CavallariSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas (Unicamp), Av. Albert Einstein 400, Campinas 13083-852, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1345-754X
Oswaldo Hideo Ando JuniorGrupo de Pesquisa em Energia e Sustentabilidade Energética-GPEnSE, Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana-UNILA, Av. Sílvio Américo Sasdelli, 1842, Foz do Iguaçu 85866-000, PR, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6951-0063
Emanuel CarrilhoInstituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-8220

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Federal University for Latin American Integration Edital PRPPG 137/2018Fundação Araucária 001National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 465389/2014-7, 303439/2018-1, 307223/2017-5, 407531/2018-1São Paulo Research Foundation 2014/50867-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical biosensing devices are known for their simple operational procedures, low fabrication cost, and suitable real-time detection. Despite these advantages, they have shown some limitations in the immobilization of biochemicals. The development of alternative materials to overcome these drawbacks has attracted significant attention. Nanocellulose-based materials have revealed valuable features due to their capacity for the immobilization of biomolecules, structural flexibility, and biocompatibility. Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) has gained a promising role as an alternative to antifouling surfaces. To widen its applicability as a biosensing device, BNC may form part of the supports for the immobilization of specific materials. The possibilities of modification methods and in situ and ex situ functionalization enable new BNC properties. With the new insights into nanoscale studies, we expect that many biosensors currently based on plastic, glass, or paper platforms will rely on renewable platforms, especially BNC ones. Moreover, substrates based on BNC seem to have paved the way for the development of sensing platforms with minimally invasive approaches, such as wearable devices, due to their mechanical flexibility and biocompatibility.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesWearable Electronic DevicesBacteriaCellulosePlasticsCellulosePlasticsbacterial nanocellulosebiosensorsex situfunctionalizationin situ

Identifiers

PMID36671977
PMCPMC9856105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.