Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671792›Full record

ReviewBiology2023

Landscape of Push Funding in Antibiotic Research: Current Status and Way Forward.

Himika Wasan, Devendra Singh, K H Reeta, Yogendra Kumar Gupta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Anti-Infective Properties, Cytotoxicity, andPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Prevalence of carbapenem-resistantSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  15. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Himika WasanDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Devendra SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-5997
K H ReetaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Yogendra Kumar GuptaPrincipal Advisor India Strategy Development, Global Antibiotics Research and Development Partnership (GARDP), New Delhi 110016, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing need for effective antibiotics is attributed to the intrinsic ability of bacteria to develop survival mechanisms. The speed at which pathogens develop resistance is at par or even faster than the discovery of newer agents. Due to the enormous cost of developing an antibiotic and poor return on investment, big pharmaceutical companies are stepping out of the antibiotic research field, and the world is now heading towards the silent pandemic of antibiotic resistance. Lack of investment in research has further led to the anemic antibiotic pipeline. To overcome these challenges, various organizations have come forward with push funding to financially assist antibiotic developers. Although push funding has somewhat reinvigorated the dwindled field of antibiotic development by bearing the financial risks of failure, the landscape is still large and staggered. Most of the funding is funneled towards the early stages; however, to carry the promising compounds forward, equal or more funding is required formid- and late-stage research. To some extent, the complexity associated with accessing the funding mechanisms has led to their underutilization. In the present review, we discuss several major push funding mechanisms, issues in their effective utilization, recent strategies adopted, and a way forward to streamline funding in antibiotic research.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistanceBARDACARB-Xcombating AMRGARDPND4BBpush funding

Identifiers

PMID36671792
PMCPMC9855914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.