Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671750›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Successional Development of the Phototrophic Community in Biological Soil Crusts on Coastal and Inland Dunes.

Sandra Kammann, Ulf Schiefelbein, Christian Dolnik, Tatiana Mikhailyuk, Eduard Demchenko, Ulf Karsten, Karin Glaser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra KammannInstitute for Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology and Phycology, Rostock University, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8032-3648
Ulf SchiefelbeinBotanical Garden, University of Rostock, 18055 Rostock, Germany.
Christian DolnikInstitute for Natural Resource Conservation, Landscape Ecology, Kiel University, 24098 Kiel, Germany.
Tatiana MikhailyukM. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, UA-01601 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Eduard DemchenkoM. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, UA-01601 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Ulf KarstenInstitute for Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology and Phycology, Rostock University, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2955-0757
Karin GlaserInstitute for Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology and Phycology, Rostock University, 18059 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-3603
University of Rostock · DENational Academy of Sciences of Ukraine · UAChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DE

Funding

Leibniz ScienceCampusPhosphorus Research Rostock W19/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are microecosystems consisting of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms growing on the topsoil. This study aims to characterize changes in the community structure of biocrust phototrophic organisms along a dune chronosequence in the Baltic Sea compared to an inland dune in northern Germany. (2) A vegetation survey followed by species determination and sediment analyses were conducted. (3) The results highlight a varying phototrophic community composition within the biocrusts regarding the different successional stages of the dunes. At both study sites, a shift from algae-dominated to lichen- and moss-dominated biocrusts in later successional dune types was observed. The algae community of both study sites shared 50% of the identified species while the moss and lichen community shared less than 15%. This indicates a more generalized occurrence of the algal taxa along both chronosequences. The mosses and lichens showed a habitat-specific species community. Moreover, an increase in the organic matter and moisture content with advanced biocrust development was detected. The enrichment of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the different biocrust types showed a similar relationship. (4) This relation can be explained by biomass growth and potential nutrient mobilization by the microorganisms. Hence, the observed biocrust development potentially enhanced soil formation and contributed to nutrient accumulation.

Indexed as

algaebiocrustscoastal duneslichenmossnutrient contentphototroph community compositionsuccessional stages

Identifiers

PMID36671750
PMCPMC9856012
OpenAlexW4313517287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.