ArticleBiology2022
Development and Validation of a Predictive Tool for Postpartum Hemorrhage after Vaginal Delivery: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemostatic biomarkers associated with postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood advances · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical predictors of postpartum vaginal and vulvar hematomas and the need for surgical treatment.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Contemporary Approach to Postpartum Hemorrhage: Early Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Therapeutic Management.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Nomogram for predicting postpartum hemorrhage in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Non-Primiparous Women Who Deliver Vaginally.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine-learning-based prediction of postpartum haemorrhage in normal vaginal births in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Development of antepartum risk prediction model for postpartum hemorrhage in Lagos, Nigeria: A prospective cohort study (Predict-PPH study).International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity worldwide. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for PPH after vaginal deliveries, based on routinely available clinical and biological data. The derivation monocentric cohort included pregnant women with vaginal delivery at Brest University Hospital (France) between April 2013 and May 2015. Immediate PPH was defined as a blood loss of ≥500 mL in the first 24 h after delivery and measured with a graduated collector bag. A logistic model, using a combination of multiple imputation and variable selection with bootstrap, was used to construct a predictive model and a score for PPH. An external validation was performed on a prospective cohort of women who delivered between 2015 and 2019 at Brest University Hospital. Among 2742 deliveries, PPH occurred in 141 (5.1%) women. Eight factors were independently associated with PPH: pre-eclampsia (aOR 6.25, 95% CI 2.35−16.65), antepartum bleeding (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 1.43−3.91), multiple pregnancy (aOR 3.24, 95% CI 1.52−6.92), labor duration ≥ 8 h (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.20−2.73), macrosomia (aOR 2.33, 95% CI 1.36−4.00), episiotomy (aOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.40−2.93), platelet count < 150 Giga/L (aOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.47−4.55) and aPTT ratio ≥ 1.1 (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.25−3.23). The derived predictive score, ranging from 0 to 10 (woman at risk if score ≥ 1), demonstrated a good discriminant power (AUROC 0.69; 95% CI 0.65−0.74) and calibration. The external validation cohort was composed of 3061 vaginal deliveries. The predictive score on this independent cohort showed an acceptable ability to discriminate (AUROC 0.66; 95% CI 0.62−0.70). We derived and validated a robust predictive model identifying women at risk for PPH using in-depth statistical methodology. This score has the potential to improve the care of pregnant women and to take preventive actions on them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.