Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671692›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Fanshu Li, Kehao Wang, Ziyuan Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Regional corneal biomechanics assessment as a function of age using Strain-Stress Index maps.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. [Controllability and predictability of riboflavin-ultraviolet A collagen cross-linking: advances in experimental techniques and theoretical research].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Corneal biomechanics and diagnostics: a review.International ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fanshu LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-9331
Kehao WangBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-7091
Ziyuan LiuBeijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5564-7424
Peking University · CNBeihang University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81900826National Natural Science Foundation of China 82000878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In early corneal examinations, the relationships between the morphological and biomechanical features of the cornea were unclear. Although consistent links have been demonstrated between the two in certain cases, these are not valid in many diseased states. An accurate assessment of the corneal biomechanical properties is essential for understanding the condition of the cornea. Studies on corneal biomechanics

Indexed as

bioengineeringbiomechanicscornealophthalmology

Identifiers

PMID36671692
PMCPMC9854753
OpenAlexW4316464700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.