Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671665›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

In Vitro 3D Modeling of Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Aurélie Louit, Todd Galbraith, François Berthod

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide (HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Advanced 3D Cell Culture Technologies and Formats.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Research Progress on Neural Cell Culture Systems.Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. The Evolution of Technology-Driven In Vitro Models for Neurodegenerative Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aurélie LouitLOEX, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.
Todd GalbraithLOEX, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.
François BerthodLOEX, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3580-0297
Université Laval · CA

Funding

National Ataxia Foundation ND
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of neurodegenerative diseases (such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) is very complex due to the difficulty in investigating the cellular dynamics within nervous tissue. Despite numerous advances in the in vivo study of these diseases, the use of in vitro analyses is proving to be a valuable tool to better understand the mechanisms implicated in these diseases. Although neural cells remain difficult to obtain from patient tissues, access to induced multipotent stem cell production now makes it possible to generate virtually all neural cells involved in these diseases (from neurons to glial cells). Many original 3D culture model approaches are currently being developed (using these different cell types together) to closely mimic degenerative nervous tissue environments. The aim of these approaches is to allow an interaction between glial cells and neurons, which reproduces pathophysiological reality by co-culturing them in structures that recapitulate embryonic development or facilitate axonal migration, local molecule exchange, and myelination (to name a few). This review details the advantages and disadvantages of techniques using scaffolds, spheroids, organoids, 3D bioprinting, microfluidic systems, and organ-on-a-chip strategies to model neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

bioprintingmicrofluidicorganoidsorgan on chipscaffoldsspheroids

Identifiers

PMID36671665
PMCPMC9855033
OpenAlexW4315628354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.