Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671655›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Pancreatic Mass Characterization Using IVIM-DKI MRI and Machine Learning-Based Multi-Parametric Texture Analysis.

Archana Vadiraj Malagi, Sivachander Shivaji, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Raju Sharma, Pramod Garg, Siddhartha Datta Gupta, Shivanand Gamanagatti, Amit Mehndiratta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Archana Vadiraj MalagiCenter for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2332-170X
Sivachander ShivajiDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis & Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Devasenathipathy KandasamyDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis & Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Raju SharmaDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis & Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Pramod GargDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Siddhartha Datta GuptaDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Shivanand GamanagattiDepartment of Radio-Diagnosis & Interventional Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Amit MehndirattaCenter for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6477-2462
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive characterization of pancreatic masses aids in the management of pancreatic lesions. Intravoxel incoherent motion-diffusion kurtosis imaging (IVIM-DKI) and machine learning-based texture analysis was used to differentiate pancreatic masses such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (SPEN), and mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP). A total of forty-eight biopsy-proven patients with pancreatic masses were recruited and classified into pNET (n = 13), MFCP (n = 6), SPEN (n = 4), and PDAC (n = 25) groups. All patients were scanned for IVIM-DKI sequences acquired with 14 b-values (0 to 2500 s/mm2) on a 1.5T MRI. An IVIM-DKI model with a 3D total variation (TV) penalty function was implemented to estimate the precise IVIM-DKI parametric maps. Texture analysis (TA) of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IVIM-DKI parametric map was performed and reduced using the chi-square test. These features were fed to an artificial neural network (ANN) for characterization of pancreatic mass subtypes and validated by 5-fold cross-validation. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analyses were used to compute the area under curve (AUC). Perfusion fraction (f) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in pNET than PDAC. The f showed better diagnostic performance for PDAC vs. MFCP with AUC:0.77. Both pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and f for PDAC vs. pNET showed an AUC of 0.73. ADC and diffusion coefficient (D) showed good diagnostic performance for pNET vs. MFCP with AUC: 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. In the TA of PDAC vs. non-PDAC, f and combined IVIM-DKI parameters showed high accuracy ≥ 84.3% and AUC ≥ 0.84. Mean f and combined IVIM-DKI parameters estimated that the IVIM-DKI model with TV texture features has the potential to be helpful in characterizing pancreatic masses.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkdiffusion kurtosis imagingdiffusion-weighted imagingintravoxel incoherent motionpancreastexture analysistotal variation penalty function

Identifiers

PMID36671655
PMCPMC9854749
OpenAlexW4313889109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.