Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671611›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Limitations of Reconstructing Pentacam Rabbit Corneal Tomography by Zernike Polynomials.

Mohamed Baraya, Jessica Moore, Bernardo T Lopes, Richard Wu, FangJun Bao, XiaoBo Zheng, Alejandra Consejo, Ahmed Abass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohamed BarayaDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-207X
Jessica MooreDepartment of Civil Engineering and Industrial Design, School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2233-2527
Bernardo T LopesDepartment of Civil Engineering and Industrial Design, School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK.
Richard WuBrighten Optix Corporation, Shilin District, Taipei 11167, Taiwan.
FangJun BaoEye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
XiaoBo ZhengEye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.
Alejandra ConsejoDepartment Applied Physics, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Ahmed AbassDepartment of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-8622-4632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the likelihood of Zernike polynomial being used for reconstructing rabbit corneal surfaces as scanned by the Pentacam segment tomographer, and hence evaluate the accuracy of corneal power maps calculated from such Zernike fitted surfaces. The study utilised a data set of both eyes of 21 rabbits using a reverse engineering approach for deductive reasoning. Pentacam raw elevation data were fitted to Zernike polynomials of orders 2 to 20. The surface fitting process to Zernike polynomials was carried out using randomly selected 80% of the corneal surface data points, and the root means squared fitting error (RMS) was determined for the other 20% of the surface data following the Pareto principle. The process was carried out for both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the corneal surfaces that were measured via Pentacam scans. Raw elevation data and the fitted corneal surfaces were then used to determine corneal axial and tangential curvature maps. For reconstructed surfaces calculated using the Zernike fitted surfaces, the mean and standard deviation of the error incurred by the fitting were calculated. For power maps computed using the raw elevation data, different levels of discrete cosine transform (DCT) smoothing were employed to infer the smoothing level utilised by the Pentacam device. The RMS error was not significantly improved for Zernike polynomial orders above 12 and 10 when fitting the anterior and posterior surfaces of the cornea, respectively. This was noted by the statistically non-significant increase in accuracy when the order was increased beyond these values. The corneal curvature calculations suggest that a smoothing process is employed in the corneal curvature maps outputted by the Pentacam device; however, the exact smoothing method is unknown. Additionally, the results suggest that fitting corneal surfaces to high-order Zernike polynomials will incur a clinical error in the calculation of axial and tangential corneal curvature of at least 0.16 ± 01 D and 0.36 ± 0.02 D, respectively. Rabbit corneal anterior and posterior surfaces scanned via the Pentacam were optimally fitted to orders 12 and 10 Zernike polynomials. This is essential to get stable values of high-order aberrations that are not affected by Zernike polynomial fittings, such as comas for Intracorneal Ring Segments (ICRS) adjustments or spherical aberration for pre-cataract operations. Smoothing was necessary to replicate the corneal curvature maps outputted by the Pentacam tomographer, and fitting corneal surfaces to Zernike polynomials introduces errors in the calculation of both the axial and tangential corneal curvatures.

Indexed as

corneal tomographycurve fittingPentacamrabbit eyeZernike polynomials

Identifiers

PMID36671611
PMCPMC9854916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.