ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Advancement in the Cuffless and Noninvasive Measurement of Blood Pressure: A Review of the Literature and Open Challenges.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal vascular parameters as AI-driven biomarkers for pulse wave velocity assessment: a telemedicine strategy for cardiovascular risk assessment.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Personalized Calibration and Hybrid Feature Fusion for Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation Using PPG and ECG Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancements and challenges in blood pressure monitoring using pulse wave propagation: a comprehensive review and ISO 81060-2 based statistical analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Factors influencing invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring accuracy: a qualitative study using the i-PARIHS framework and personas.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Beyond the Cuff: State-of-the-Art on Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients: A Guide for Emergency Physicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring Utilizing Strain Gauge Technology.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Review
- A prototype photoplethysmography-based cuffless device shows promising results in tracking changes in blood pressure.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- Detection of Cardiovascular Disease from Clinical Parameters Using a One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a chronic condition that is one of the prominent reasons behind cardiovascular disease, brain stroke, and organ failure. Left unnoticed and untreated, the deterioration in a health condition could even result in mortality. If it can be detected early, with proper treatment, undesirable outcomes can be avoided. Until now, the gold standard is the invasive way of measuring blood pressure (BP) using a catheter. Additionally, the cuff-based and noninvasive methods are too cumbersome or inconvenient for frequent measurement of BP. With the advancement of sensor technology, signal processing techniques, and machine learning algorithms, researchers are trying to find the perfect relationships between biomedical signals and changes in BP. This paper is a literature review of the studies conducted on the cuffless noninvasive measurement of BP using biomedical signals. Relevant articles were selected using specific criteria, then traditional techniques for BP measurement were discussed along with a motivation for cuffless measurement use of biomedical signals and machine learning algorithms. The review focused on the progression of different noninvasive cuffless techniques rather than comparing performance among different studies. The literature survey concluded that the use of deep learning proved to be the most accurate among all the cuffless measurement techniques. On the other side, this accuracy has several disadvantages, such as lack of interpretability, computationally extensive, standard validation protocol, and lack of collaboration with health professionals. Additionally, the continuing work by researchers is progressing with a potential solution for these challenges. Finally, future research directions have been provided to encounter the challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.