Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671258›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Citizen Contribution for Searching for Alternative Antimicrobial Activity Substances in Soil.

Rosa Fernández-Fernández, Beatriz Robredo, Enrique Navajas, Carmen Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Environmental persistence and transmission dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Production of Pumilarin and a Novel Circular Bacteriocin, Altitudin A, byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Green Antimicrobials.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosa Fernández-FernándezArea of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Beatriz RobredoArea of Didactic of Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Enrique NavajasArea of Didactic of Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.
Carmen TorresArea of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3709-1690

Funding

MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades of Spain Rosa Fernández-Fernández has a predoctoral fellowship FPU (FPU18/05438).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is problematic worldwide, and due to the loss of efficiency of many antibiotics, the pressure to discover alternative antimicrobial molecules has increased. Soil harbors a great biodiversity and biomass of microorganisms, and many antibiotics are produced by soil microbiota. Therefore, soil is a promising reservoir to find new antimicrobial agents. In this respect, novel pedagogical strategies regarding the AMR global crisis have recently been developed in different countries worldwide. Highlighted is the service-learning project "MicroMundo" integrated in a global Citizen Science project called "Tiny Earth". Hence, the present work aimed at determining the antimicrobial activity of soil bacteria, the biodiversity of the selected isolates as putative antimicrobial producers, and their antibiotic resistance profile. Moreover, through the MicroMundo project, we tried to illustrate the relevant link between science and education and the benefits of implementing service-learning methodologies to raise awareness of the AMR problem and to contribute to the search for new alternatives. A total of 16 teachers, 25 university students and 300 secondary school students participated in the search for antimicrobial activity on a collection of 2600 isolates obtained from a total of 130 soil samples analysed. In total, 132 isolates (5% of total tested) were selected as potential antimicrobial producers when two indicator bacteria were used (Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis); the most frequent genus among these isolates was Bacillus, followed by Pseudomonas, Paenibacillus and Serratia. The antimicrobial activity (AA) of the 132 potential antimicrobial producers was studied in a second step against 15 indicator bacteria (of six genera and thirteen species, including relevant pathogens). Of the 132 potentially producing bacteria, 32 were selected for further characterization. In this respect, 18 isolates showed low AA, 12 isolates were considered as medium producers, and 2 highly antimicrobial-producing isolates were found (Brevibacillus laterosporus X7262 and Staphylococcus hominis X7276) showing AA against 80% of the 15 indicators tested. Moreover, 48% of the antimicrobial-producing bacteria were susceptible to all antibiotics tested. Due to citizen science, antimicrobial-producing bacteria of great interest have been isolated, managing to raise awareness about the problem of AMR.

Indexed as

antimicrobial-producing bacteriaantimicrobial resistanceMicroMundosoil

Identifiers

PMID36671258
PMCPMC9854653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.