Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36671252›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

National Disparities in Antibiotic Prescribing by Race, Ethnicity, Age Group, and Sex in United States Ambulatory Care Visits, 2009 to 2016.

Eric H Young, Kelsey A Strey, Grace C Lee, Travis J Carlson, Jim M Koeller, Vidal M Mendoza, Kelly R Reveles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Variations in antibiotic prescribing among children enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid, 2013-2019.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Next Steps in Ambulatory Stewardship.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric H YoungCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Kelsey A StreyCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Grace C LeeCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Travis J CarlsonFred Wilson School of Pharmacy, High Point University, High Point, NC 27268, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-3030
Jim M KoellerCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Vidal M MendozaCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
Kelly R RevelesCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78701, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-4879
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USHigh Point University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While efforts have been made in the United States (US) to optimize antimicrobial use, few studies have explored antibiotic prescribing disparities that may drive future interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate disparities in antibiotic prescribing among US ambulatory care visits by patient subgroups. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study utilizing the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2009 to 2016. Antibiotic use was described as antibiotic visits per 1000 total patient visits. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was determined by ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes assigned during the visit. Subgroup analyses were conducted by patient race, ethnicity, age group, and sex. Over 7.0 billion patient visits were included; 11.3% included an antibiotic prescription. Overall and inappropriate antibiotic prescription rates were highest in Black (122.2 and 78.0 per 1000) and Hispanic patients (138.6 and 79.8 per 1000). Additionally, overall antibiotic prescription rates were highest in patients less than 18 years (169.6 per 1000) and female patients (114.1 per 1000), while inappropriate antibiotic prescription rates were highest in patients 18 to 64 years (66.0 per 1000) and in males (64.8 per 1000). In this nationally representative study, antibiotic prescribing disparities were found by patient race, ethnicity, age group, and sex.

Indexed as

antibioticsepidemiologyhealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID36671252
PMCPMC9854843
OpenAlexW4313327361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.