ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Validation of the Arabic Version of Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Early Childhood Education in Qatar.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A family-systemic intervention for mental health with refugees in Jordan: Protocol of a randomised controlled trial of StrongerTogether.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Accuracy of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in identifying common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional analytical study.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Electronic device usage among preschool children and its association with mental health status in Saudi Arabian kindergartens.Saudi medical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the validity of the Arabic version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SQD, teacher version) among a sample of young children in Qatar. Teachers rated 502 children aged four to five years from public preschools using the SDQ teacher version. The factor structure of the SDQ was analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. I calculated Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlations to determine the reliability of the five subscales and overall SDQ. The findings showed acceptable reliability, with the exception of the Peer Problems Scale. Common fit statistics-including the comparative fit index, non-normed fit index, and goodness-of-fit index-were used for the confirmatory factor analysis. In general, satisfactory psychometric characteristics were observed for the preschool SDQ, suggesting that the questionnaire could be administered to preschool-age children in Qatar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.