Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670510›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2023

Investigating strategies to improve AccesS to Kidney transplantation (the ASK trial): a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with parallel process evaluation.

Pippa K Bailey, Fergus J Caskey, Stephanie MacNeill, Rachel Ashford, Lindsay Pryce, Liise Kayler, Yoav Ben-Shlomo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pippa K BaileyBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK. pippa.bailey@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2323-1082
Fergus J CaskeyBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Stephanie MacNeillBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Rachel AshfordBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Lindsay PryceBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
Liise KaylerErie County Medical Center, Buffalo, NY, 14215, USA.
Yoav Ben-ShlomoBristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
University of Bristol · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBErie County Medical Center · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214554/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe UK's living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) activity falls behind that of many other countries internationally, with less than 20% of those eligible receiving a LDKT each year. Certain individuals with kidney disease in the UK appear to be particularly disadvantaged in accessing a LDKT; the most socioeconomically deprived people with kidney disease are 60% less likely to receive a LDKT than the least deprived. Improving equity in living-donor kidney transplantation has been highlighted as an international research priority.

methodsThis feasibility trial was designed to determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability of a multicomponent intervention designed to improve access to living-donor kidney transplantation. The intervention comprises three main components: (i) a meeting between a home educator and the transplant candidate for a dedicated discussion about living-donor kidney transplantation, living kidney donation and potential donors; (ii) a standardized letter from a healthcare professional to a candidate's potential donors and (iii) a home-based education and family engagement session including two home educators, the transplant candidate and their family. The primary objectives are to establish the feasibility (i) of delivering the developed intervention in existing care pathways and (ii) of undertaking a randomised controlled trial of the intervention. A mixed-methods parallel process evaluation will investigate the acceptability, implementation and mechanisms of impact of the intervention. The trial is based at two UK hospitals: a transplanting hospital and a non-transplanting referral hospital. Individuals are eligible if they are ≥ 18 years old, are active on the kidney transplant waiting list or have been referred for transplant listing and do not have a potential living-donor undergoing surgical assessment. Randomisation will be undertaken with concealed allocation. Participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 to (i) the intervention or (ii) usual care, stratified by site to ensure a balance in terms of local differences. Minimisation will be used to ensure balance in sex, age group and socioeconomic strata, with probability weighting of 0.8 in order to reduce predictability. The primary outcomes are recruitment (% of those eligible and invited who consent to randomisation) and retention (% of participants completing follow-up). DISCUSSION: Findings will inform the design of a future fully powered, randomised controlled trial to formally evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention at improving equitable access to living-donor kidney transplantation.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry ISRCTN10989132 Applied 30/10/20.

Indexed as

FeasibilityKidney transplantationNephrologyRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36670510
PMCPMC9854094
OpenAlexW4317548787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.