Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670438›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial.

Joshua P Vogel, Veronica Pingray, Fernando Althabe, Luz Gibbons, Mabel Berrueta, Yeshita Pujar, Manjunath Somannavar, Sunil S Vernekar, Alvaro Ciganda, Rocio Rodriguez and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Joshua.vogel@burnet.edu.au.
Veronica PingrayInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando AlthabeInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luz GibbonsInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mabel BerruetaInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Yeshita PujarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Manjunath SomannavarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Sunil S VernekarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Alvaro CigandaInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rocio RodriguezInstituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Saraswati A WellingWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Amit RevankarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Savitri BendigeriWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Jayashree Ashok KumarGadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, India.
Shruti Bhavi PatilGadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, India.
Aravind KarinagannanavarGadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag, Karnataka, India.
Raveendra R AnteenGeneral Hospital, Gokak, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
M R PavithraGeneral Hospital, Gokak, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Shukla ShettyJJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
B LathaJJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
H M MeghaJJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India.
Suman S GaddiVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka, India.
Shaila ChikkagowdraVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka, India.
Bellara RaghavendraVijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), Ballari, Karnataka, India.
Elizabeth ArmariMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nick ScottMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Katherine EddyMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Caroline S E HomerMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shivaprasad S GoudarWomen's and Children's Health Research Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARBurnet Institute · AUInstitute of Medical Sciences · INJSS Medical College and Hospital · INVijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences · INKLE Society Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) Labour Care Guide (LCG) is a paper-based labour monitoring tool designed to facilitate the implementation of WHO's latest guidelines for effective, respectful care during labour and childbirth. Implementing the LCG into routine intrapartum care requires a strategy that improves healthcare provider practices during labour and childbirth. Such a strategy might optimize the use of Caesarean section (CS), along with potential benefits on the use of other obstetric interventions, maternal and perinatal health outcomes, and women's experience of care. However, the effects of a strategy to implement the LCG have not been evaluated in a randomised trial. This study aims to: (1) develop and optimise a strategy for implementing the LCG (formative phase); and (2) To evaluate the implementation of the LCG strategy compared with usual care (trial phase).

methodsIn the formative phase, we will co-design the LCG strategy with key stakeholders informed by facility assessments and provider surveys, which will be field tested in one hospital. The LCG strategy includes a LCG training program, ongoing supportive supervision from senior clinical staff, and audit and feedback using the Robson Classification. We will then conduct a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized pilot trial in four public hospitals in India, to evaluate the effect of the LCG strategy intervention compared to usual care (simplified WHO partograph). The primary outcome is the CS rate in nulliparous women with singleton, term, cephalic pregnancies in spontaneous labour (Robson Group 1). Secondary outcomes include clinical and process of care outcomes, as well as women's experience of care outcomes. We will also conduct a process evaluation during the trial, using standardized facility assessments, in-depth interviews and surveys with providers, audits of completed LCGs, labour ward observations and document reviews. An economic evaluation will consider implementation costs and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Findings of this trial will guide clinicians, administrators and policymakers on how to effectively implement the LCG, and what (if any) effects the LCG strategy has on process of care, health and experience outcomes. The trial findings will inform the rollout of LCG internationally.

trial registrationCTRI/2021/01/030695 (Protocol version 1.4, 25 April 2022).

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionParturitionFemaleHospitalsHumansPilot ProjectsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWorld Health OrganizationCaesarean sectionIntrapartum careLabour Care GuidePartograph

Identifiers

PMID36670438
PMCPMC9862839
OpenAlexW4317543048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.