Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670432›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

How are hospitals in England caring for women at risk of preterm birth in 2021? The influence of national guidance on preterm birth care in England: a national questionnaire.

Naomi Carlisle, Angharad Care, Dilly O C Anumba, Sonia Dalkin, Jane Sandall, Andrew H Shennan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Outcomes following elective cerclage versus ultrasound surveillance in women with one prior preterm event.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Naomi CarlisleDepartment of Women and Children's Health, The School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, 10th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. naomi.h.carlisle@kcl.ac.uk.
Angharad CareCentre for Women and Children's Health Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Dilly O C AnumbaAcademic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Sonia DalkinFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, The School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, 10th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, The School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, 10th Floor North Wing, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBNorthumbria University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research NIHR300484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidance (Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 (SBLCBv2) Element 5) was published in 2019, with the aim to standardise preterm care in England. We plan to identify how many preterm birth surveillance clinics there are in England, and to define current national management in caring for women who are both asymptomatic and high-risk of preterm birth, and who arrive symptomatically in threatened preterm labour, to assist preterm management both nationally and internationally.

methodsAn online survey comprising of 27 questions was sent to all maternity units in England between February 2021 to July 2021.

resultsData was obtained from 96 units. Quantitative analysis and free text analysis was then undertaken. We identified 78 preterm birth surveillance clinics in England, an increase from 30 preterm clinics in 2017. This is a staggering 160% increase in 4 years. SBLCBv2 has had a considerable impact in increasing preterm birth surveillance clinic services, with the majority (61%) of sites reporting that the NHS England publication influenced their unit in setting up their clinic. Variations exist at every step of the preterm pathway, such as deciding which risk factors warrant referral, distinguishing within particular risk factors, and offering screening tests and treatment options.

conclusionsWhile variations in care still do persist, hospitals have done well to increase preterm surveillance clinics, under the difficult circumstances of the COVID pandemic and many without specific additional funding.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthEnglandFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesPretermPreterm clinicPreterm pathwaySaving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2

Identifiers

PMID36670432
PMCPMC9854090
OpenAlexW4317603123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.