Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670428›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2023

Use of KIDSCREEN health-related quality of life instruments in the general population of children and adolescents: a scoping review.

Eva-Grethe Befus, Sølvi Helseth, Eirin Mølland, Thomas Westergren, Liv Fegran, Kristin Haraldstad

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew KIDSCREEN 52, 27 and 10 items: a cross-sectional study of self and parents reports in youth with and without physical disabilities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Health-related quality of life and its association with socioeconomic status and mental health in 5- to 7-year-old children: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva-Grethe BefusFaculty of Health- and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway. eva-grethe.befus@uia.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4577-8639
Sølvi HelsethFaculty of Health- and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6411-9057
Eirin MøllandDepartment of Economics and Finance, School of Business and Law, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-936X
Thomas WestergrenFaculty of Health- and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4253-1996
Liv FegranFaculty of Health- and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-8686
Kristin HaraldstadFaculty of Health- and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, P.O. Box 422, 4604, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-147X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSubjectively assessing health related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents is increasingly important in the public health field. One valid and widely used generic HRQoL instrument is the KIDSCREEN questionnaire. The aim of this study was to map all studies using KIDSCREEN instruments in the general population of children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.

methodsA scoping review was conducted. The search strategy was formulated according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Scoping Reviews guidelines. The databases Cinahl, socINDEX, Medline, Embase, APA Psychinfo, Scopus, and Eric were searched in October 2021.

resultsIn total, 1365 papers were eligible for screening, 1031 were excluded and 334 reports were read in full. 252 reports were included. KIDSCREEN studies in the general population was predominantly conducted in Europe (n = 211). Most studies (n = 179) had a cross sectional design, while few experimental studies (n = 24) were found. The three KIDSCREEN versions comprising of 10, 27 and 52 items, were equally distributed between studies. The self-reported version (n = 225) of the KIDSCREEN instrument was more prevalent than the proxy version, while few studies discussed a cut point. Study contexts reflected international trends of public health challenges, commonly including mental- and psychosocial health, physical activity, socioeconomic status, and obesity.

conclusionKIDSCREEN is widely used in cross sectional studies assessing common public health challenges. Experimental and longitudinal assessments, possibly including relevant cut offs remain mainly unexplored and are recommended for future research.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth-related quality of lifeKidscreenQuality of lifeScoping review

Identifiers

PMID36670428
PMCPMC9857919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.