Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670394›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

A qualitative exploration of the experiences of peer leaders in an intervention to improve diabetes medication adherence in African Americans.

Adati Tarfa, Jenna Nordin, Mattigan Mott, Martha Maurer, Olayinka Shiyanbola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adati TarfaUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-2396
Jenna NordinUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-4519
Mattigan MottUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA.
Martha MaurerUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7404-8881
Olayinka ShiyanbolaUniversity of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA. Olayinka.shiyanbola@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6018-2104
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Expanding the CAARN to accelerate research on multiple chronic conditions with rural and African-American communities and health-care providersR33AG061699 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Dorothy Farrar Edwards, Hongrui Jiang · 2019 to 2026
$5.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002373NIA NIH HHS R33 AG061699Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin Partnership Program 3086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican Americans chronically managing their diabetes benefit from receiving support from peers with shared experiences. Peer support is known to improve the well-being of individuals receiving support, however, there is limited literature on the experiences of those providing the support. The Peers Supporting Health Literacy, Self-efficacy, Self-Advocacy, and Adherence (Peers LEAD) program pairs Peer Ambassadors who are adherent to their diabetes medication, with Peer Buddies who need support with their medication adherence. Peer Ambassadors engage with Peer Buddies as they receive diabetes information, develop the skills and motivation to address identified psychosocial/sociocultural issues to enhance their diabetes medication adherence. This study qualitatively explores the experiences of African Americans who provided peer support in the Peers LEAD medication adherence intervention.

methodsTwo focus groups were conducted with twelve Peer Ambassadors to explore their experiences of providing peer support in the Peers LEAD medication adherence intervention. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using an inductive open coding approach.

resultsEmergent themes provided insight into Peer Ambassador' rationale for providing peer support and the benefits and challenges they experienced in their roles. Themes regarding their rationale included: their desire to receive support for their diabetes self-management as well as to contribute to their communities in reducing the stigma associated with diabetes. The perceived benefits they gained centered on creating interpersonal connections, experiencing personal growth as they adapted to their roles, and experiencing opportunities to contribute to an intervention regardless of professional training. Peer Ambassadors reflected on the challenges which included difficulties on coming to terms with their role as Peer Ambassadors, seeing African Americans experience complications associated with diabetes, and navigating supporting Peer Buddies who are also burdened with the challenges their family members are experiencing with managing their diabetes.

conclusionsThis study provides unique insight to what motivates individuals to provide peer support and what they gain from these experiences despite the challenges. Understanding the experiences of peers participating in such interventions may help inform the structure and content of programs that use peer support to focus on the benefits of and the motivation for participating in the program.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanDiabetes MellitusFocus GroupsHumansMedication AdherencePeer GroupAfrican AmericanMedication adherencePeer leaderPeer supportType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36670394
PMCPMC9862861
OpenAlexW4317543091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.