ArticleBMC primary care2023
An analytic hierarchy process analysis for reinforcing doctor-patient communication.
Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward the Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Korean Clinical Practice: Study Protocol for a Foundational Research Project.Journal of Korean medical science · 2026Review
- Development and pilot study of family-centered neonatal palliative care.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Using Video Ethnography and Stimulated Recall Interviews to Describe the Diagnostic Process in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Cancer Risk Perception and Patient-provider Communication with Pap Test Among African American and Sub-Saharan African-born Women.Journal of community health · 2025Article
- Construction of a home-based self-management program for patients with indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter based on the IMB model.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Real-time video communication during percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is beneficial to postoperative recovery: a single-center retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Constructing a Management Evaluation Index System Based on Hierarchical Analysis in the Interventional Therapy of Hematological Surgery in Hospitals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Medical Device Aging and Replacement Decisions within Hospital Environments: A User-Centered Approach.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Understanding the Utilization of Tertiary Hospitals by Mild Disease Patients: Travel Cost Method Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Working experiences of remote interpreters in health care settings-insights from Austria and Germany.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Exploring patients and caregivers needs and experiences in oncological physiotherapy: a call for collaborative care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Belief in a just world and fair behavior among clinical nurses: a moderated mediation model of empathy and observer justice sensitivity.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Development of an index system for the scientific literacy of medical staff: a modified Delphi study in China.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Understanding of disease status, prognosis and estimated cost of treatment among cancer patients: experience from a tertiary cancer centre in Nepal.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- Examining the factors associated with inpatients' perception of overtreatment in Korea: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients' expectations for treatment scale-clinician version.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Analyzing the Effectiveness of Data-Linked Projects for Health Promotion in Public Health Centers of South Korea.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Patients' Perceptions of Physicians' Health Literacy Competencies and "Good" Communication in Family Medicine: A Q Methodology Study.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- Medical service quality evaluation based on LDA and sentiment analysis: Examples of seven chronic diseases.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs the health paradigm shifts toward patient-centeredness, patients can actively participate in their own treatment. However, there is still a unilateral aspect of doctor-patient communication, so it is necessary to specify obstacles between doctors and patients. Therefore, this study attempted to extract obstacles that block doctor-patient communication and to analyze differences in perception of doctor-patient communication.
methodsA total of 35 questionnaires composed of brainstorming for the study were distributed, and a total of 21 questionnaires were used for analysis. The collected data was analyzed by AHP using dress ver 17.0.
resultsAs a result of the study, doctors ranked the priority of health communication in the order of professionalism, reliability, fairness, communication, and psychologically. On the other hand, for patients, the priority factors of health communication were communication, fairness, professionalism, reliability, and psychologically.
conclusionIn order to improve the quality of health communication between doctors and patients, doctors will be able to communicate from the patient's point of view and strengthen communication with patients by providing consistent medical services and patients need to trust the doctor and patients need to trust their doctors and participate in the medical process faithfully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.