Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670315›Full record

Observational studyCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Emergency airway management in a tertiary trauma centre (AIRMAN): a one-year prospective longitudinal study.

Thomas Hall, Murdoch Leeies, Duane Funk, Carmen Hrymak, Faisal Siddiqui, Holly Black, Kim Webster, Jenn Tkach, Matt Waskin, Brenden Dufault and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Evidence-based Emergency Tracheal Intubation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas HallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. umhall32@myumanitoba.ca.
Murdoch LeeiesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Section of Critical Care, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Duane FunkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Section of Critical Care, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Carmen HrymakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Section of Critical Care, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Faisal SiddiquiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Section of Critical Care, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Holly BlackDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kim WebsterHealth Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jenn TkachHealth Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Matt WaskinHealth Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Brenden DufaultGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Health Care Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Stephen KowalskiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Section of Critical Care, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CAHealth Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency airway management can be associated with a range of complications including long-term neurologic injury and death. We studied the first-pass success rate with emergency airway management in a tertiary care trauma centre. Secondary outcomes were to identify factors associated with first-pass success and factors associated with adverse events peri-intubation.

methodsWe performed a single-centre, prospective, observational study of patients ≥ 17 yr old who were intubated in the emergency department (ED), surgical intensive care unit (SICU), medical intensive care unit (MICU), and inpatient wards at our institution. Ethics approval was obtained from the local research ethics board.

resultsIn a seven-month period, there were 416 emergency intubations and a first-pass success rate of 73.1%. The first-pass success rates were 57.5% on the ward, 66.1% in the intensive care units (ICUs) and 84.3% in the ED. Equipment also varied by location; videolaryngoscopy use was 65.1% in the ED and only 10.6% on wards. A multivariate regression model using the least absolute shrinkage and selection algorithm (LASSO) showed that the odds ratios for factors associated with two or more intubation attempts were location (wards, 1.23; MICU, 1.24; SICU, 1.19; reference group, ED), physiologic instability (1.19), an anatomically difficult airway (1.05), hypoxemia (1.98), lack of neuromuscular blocker use (2.28), and intubator inexperience (1.41).

conclusionsFirst-pass success rates varied widely between locations within the hospital and were less than those published from similar institutions, except for the ED. We are revamping ICU protocols to improve the first-pass success rate.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealTrauma CentersAirway ManagementEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLaryngoscopyLongitudinal StudiesProspective Studiescritical careemergencyintubationlaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36670315
PMCPMC9857903
OpenAlexW4317549163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.