Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670282›Full record

ReviewMolecular diversity2024

Recent advances in the area of plant-based anti-cancer drug discovery using computational approaches.

Agneesh Pratim Das, Subhash Mohan Agarwal

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Phytochemicals in Drug Discovery-A Confluence of Tradition and Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Agneesh Pratim DasBioinformatics Division, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, India.
Subhash Mohan AgarwalBioinformatics Division, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301, India. smagarwal@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6685-789X
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 58/14/2020/PHA/BMSIndian Council of Medical Research 59/03/2019/Online/BMS/TRM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytocompounds are a well-established source of drug discovery due to their unique chemical and functional diversities. In the area of cancer therapeutics, several phytocompounds have been used till date to design and develop new drugs. One of the desired interests of pharmaceutical companies and researchers globally is that new anti-cancer leads are discovered, for which phytocompounds can be considered a valuable source. Simultaneously, in recent years, the growth of computational approaches like virtual screening (VS), molecular dynamics (MD), pharmacophore modelling, Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion and Toxicity (ADMET), network biology, and machine learning (ML) has gained importance due to their efficiency, reduced time-consuming nature, and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, the present review amalgamates the information on plant-based molecules identified for cancer lead discovery from in silico approaches. The mandate of this review is to discuss studies published in the last 5-6 years that aim to identify the phytomolecules as leads against cancer with the help of traditional computational approaches as well as newer techniques like network pharmacology and ML. This review also lists the databases and webservers available in the public domain for phytocompounds related information that can be harnessed for drug discovery. It is expected that the present review would be useful to pharmacologists, medicinal chemists, molecular biologists, and other researchers involved in the development of natural products (NPs) into clinically effective lead molecules.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryPhytochemicalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningMolecular Dynamics SimulationNeoplasmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPhytochemicalsAnti-cancerBioinformaticsDrug discoveryNatural productsPhytomolecules

Identifiers

PMID36670282
PMCPMC9859751
OpenAlexW4317604167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.