Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670236›Full record

Trial reportLa Radiologia medica2023

Fully automatic classification of breast lesions on multi-parameter MRI using a radiomics model with minimal number of stable, interpretable features.

Jing Zhang, Chenao Zhan, Chenxiu Zhang, Yang Song, Xu Yan, Yihao Guo, Tao Ai, Guang Yang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nomogram for reducing unnecessary biopsies of breast lesions based on MRI and clinical features: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing Zhang *Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Chenao Zhan *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chenxiu ZhangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yang SongMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Xu YanMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Yihao GuoMR Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Guangzhou, China.
Tao AiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. gyang@phy.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8942-427X

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61731009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo build an automatic computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) pipeline based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and explore the role of different imaging features in the classification of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 222 histopathology-confirmed breast lesions, together with their BI-RADS scores, were included in the analysis. The cohort was randomly split into training (159) and test (63) cohorts, and another 50 lesions were collected as an external cohort. An nnUNet-based lesion segmentation model was trained to automatically segment lesion ROI, from which radiomics features were extracted for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and contrast-enhanced (DCE) pharmacokinetic parametric maps. Models based on combinations of sequences were built using support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR). Also, the performance of these sequence combinations and BI-RADS scores were compared. The Dice coefficient and AUC were calculated  to evaluate the segmentation and classification results. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess clinical utility.

resultsThe segmentation model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.831 in the test cohort. The radiomics model used only three features from diffusion coefficient (ADC) images, T2WI, and DCE-derived kinetic mapping, and achieved an AUC of 0.946 [0.883-0.990], AUC of 0.842 [0.6856-0.998] in the external cohort, which was higher than the BI-RADS score with an AUC of 0.872 [0.752-0.975]. The joint model using both radiomics score and BI-RADS score achieved the highest test AUC of 0.975 [0.935-1.000], with a sensitivity of 0.920 and a specificity of 0.923.

conclusionThree radiomics features can be used to construct an automatic radiomics-based pipeline to improve the diagnosis of breast lesions and reduce unnecessary biopsies, especially when using jointly with BI-RADS scores.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingBreastDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerMultiparametric MRIRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.