Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670187›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Translocation of a single Arg[Formula: see text] peptide across a DOPC/DOPG(4:1) model membrane using the weighted ensemble method.

Seungho Choe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Computational Insights into Membrane Disruption by Cell-Penetrating Peptides.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Weighted Ensemble Simulation: Advances in methods, software, and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seungho ChoeDepartment of Energy Science & Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology (DGIST), Daegu, 42988 South Korea.
Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is difficult to observe a spontaneous translocation of cell-penetrating peptides(CPPs) within a short time scale (e.g., a few hundred ns) in all-atom molecular dynamics(MD) simulations because the time required for the translocation of usual CPPs is on the order of minutes or so. In this work, we report a spontaneous translocation of a single Arg[Formula: see text](R9) across a DOPC/DOPG(4:1) model membrane within an order of a few tens ns scale by using the weighted ensemble(WE) method. We identify how water molecules and the orientation of Arg[Formula: see text] play a role in translocation. We also show how lipid molecules are transported along with Arg[Formula: see text]. In addition, we present free energy profiles of the translocation across the membrane using umbrella sampling and show that a single Arg[Formula: see text] translocation is energetically unfavorable. We expect that the WE method can help study interactions of CPPs with various model membranes within MD simulation approaches.

Indexed as

Cell-Penetrating PeptidesLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylglycerols1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol1,2-oleoylphosphatidylcholineCell-Penetrating PeptidesLipid BilayersPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylglycerols

Identifiers

PMID36670187
PMCPMC9860060
OpenAlexW4317545862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.