ArticleScientific reports2023
Fluid-structure interaction simulation of visceral perfusion and impact of different cannulation methods on aortic dissection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Computational studies on visceral artery lesions and aortic pathologies involving visceral branches: a comprehensive review for the clinician.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of Residual Intimal Flap Displacement Post-TEVAR on TBAD Haemodynamics in Compliant, Patient-specific CFD Simulations Informed by MRI.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Impact of direct mesenteric perfusion on malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024Article
- Neo-Hookean modeling of nonlinear coupled behavior in circular plates supported by micro-pillars.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Investigation of Type A Aortic Dissection Using Computational Modelling.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Patient-Specific Haemodynamic Analysis of Virtual Grafting Strategies in Type-B Aortic Dissection: Impact of Compliance Mismatch.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2024Article
- Cannulation Strategies in Type A Aortic Dissection: Overlooked Details and Novel Approaches.Cureus · 2023Review
- Assessing the impact of turbulent kinetic energy boundary conditions on turbulent flow simulations using computational fluid dynamics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemodynamics in aortic dissection (AD) is closely associated with the risk of aortic aneurysm, rupture, and malperfusion. Altered blood flow in patients with AD can lead to severe complications such as visceral malperfusion. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of cannulation flow on hemodynamics in AD using a fluid-structure interaction simulation. We developed a specific-idealized AD model that included an intimal tear in the descending thoracic aorta, a re-entry tear in the left iliac artery, and nine branches. Two different cannulation methods were tested: (1) axillary cannulation (AC) only through the brachiocephalic trunk and (2) combined axillary and femoral cannulation (AFC) through the brachiocephalic trunk and the right common iliac artery. AC was found to result in the development of a pressure difference between the true lumen and false lumen, owing to the difference in the flow rate through each lumen. This pressure difference collapsed the true lumen, disturbing blood flow to the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. However, in AFC, the pressure levels between the two lumens were similar, and no collapse occurred. Moreover, the visceral flow was higher than that in AC. Lastly, the stiffness of the intimal flap affected the true lumen's collapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.