Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670144›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple negative breast cancer using deep learning on multiparametric MRI.

Zijian Zhou, Beatriz E Adrada, Rosalind P Candelaria, Nabil A Elshafeey, Medine Boge, Rania M Mohamed, Sanaz Pashapoor, Jia Sun, Zhan Xu, Bikash Panthi and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zijian ZhouDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1472, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Beatriz E AdradaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rosalind P CandelariaDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nabil A ElshafeeyDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Medine BogeDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rania M MohamedDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Sanaz PashapoorDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jia SunDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhan XuDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1472, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Bikash PanthiDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1472, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jong Bum SonDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1472, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mary S GuirguisDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Miral M PatelDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gary J WhitmanDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Tanya W MoseleyDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Marion E ScogginsDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jason B WhiteDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jennifer K LittonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly K HuntDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Wei YangDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Peng WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Clinton YamDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mark D PagelDepartment of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Gaiane M RauchDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. gmrauch@mdanderson.org.
Jingfei MaDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1472, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. jma@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) followed by surgery are currently standard of care for TNBC with 50-60% of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). We investigated ability of deep learning (DL) on dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion weighted imaging acquired early during NAST to predict TNBC patients' pCR status in the breast. During the development phase using the images of 130 TNBC patients, the DL model achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.97 ± 0.04 and 0.82 ± 0.10 for the training and the validation, respectively. The model achieved an AUC of 0.86 ± 0.03 when evaluated in the independent testing group of 32 patients. In an additional prospective blinded testing group of 48 patients, the model achieved an AUC of 0.83 ± 0.02. These results demonstrated that DL based on multiparametric MRI can potentially differentiate TNBC patients with pCR or non-pCR in the breast early during NAST.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36670144
PMCPMC9859781
OpenAlexW4317614469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.