Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36670132›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Visuospatial information foraging describes search behavior in learning latent environmental features.

David L Barack, Akram Bakkour, Daphna Shohamy, C Daniel Salzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David L BarackDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, USA. dbarack@gmail.com.
Akram BakkourDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Daphna ShohamyMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, USA.
C Daniel SalzmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Funding

Neurophysiology underlying neural representations of valueR01MH082017 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Stefano Fusi, C. DANIEL SALZMAN · 2008 to 2026
$11.3M
Training in Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders: From Animal Models to PatientsT32MH018870 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Guillermo Horga, Christoph Kellendonk · 1988 to 2026
$9.8M
Neural signatures of learning complex environments in the amygdala-prefrontal networkK99DA048748 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BARACK, DAVID · 2019 to 2021
$444k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA048748NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082017NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the real world, making sequences of decisions to achieve goals often depends upon the ability to learn aspects of the environment that are not directly perceptible. Learning these so-called latent features requires seeking information about them. Prior efforts to study latent feature learning often used single decisions, used few features, and failed to distinguish between reward-seeking and information-seeking. To overcome this, we designed a task in which humans and monkeys made a series of choices to search for shapes hidden on a grid. On our task, the effects of reward and information outcomes from uncovering parts of shapes could be disentangled. Members of both species adeptly learned the shapes and preferred to select tiles expected to be informative earlier in trials than previously rewarding ones, searching a part of the grid until their outcomes dropped below the average information outcome-a pattern consistent with foraging behavior. In addition, how quickly humans learned the shapes was predicted by how well their choice sequences matched the foraging pattern, revealing an unexpected connection between foraging and learning. This adaptive search for information may underlie the ability in humans and monkeys to learn latent features to support goal-directed behavior in the long run.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorLearningChoice BehaviorHumansReward

Identifiers

PMID36670132
PMCPMC9860038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.